What Does One Have To Do To Be Permanently Banned?

[Jeff Reynolds]

http://debatebothsides.com/showpost.php?p=813102&postcount=116


Will Thomas will be informed about "Lou Aubuchont" being a disinformation hack.

Remember if you do this with Will Thomas you will more conclusively have blown your cover than you have with us here who know you only as Jeff Reynolds or Socrates. Specific acusations against Lou will have to come from an identifiable person, not from a pseudonym. Of course go ahead if you like. Your putting yourself permanently six feet under would not bother me in the slightest.

[A Voice]

So far this morning I have had to deal with four seperate issues in the Science in the News forum. For such a small group of people you all produce twice as much grief for moderators than does the entire Current Events forum.

Try to get along. Try to follow the rules. Try to develop thougher skins.

A Voice

[Fair &Balanced Who Ca]

So far this morning I have had to deal with four seperate issues in the Science in the News forum. For such a small group of people you all produce twice as much grief for moderators than does the entire Current Events forum.

Try to get along. Try to follow the rules. Try to develop thougher skins.

A Voice

They really don't seem to like each other over there.

:D

[CDsNuTz]

http://debatebothsides.com/showpost.php?p=813102&postcount=116



Originally Posted by halva


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Reynolds
Will Thomas will be informed about "Lou Aubuchont" being a disinformation hack.

Remember if you do this with Will Thomas you will more conclusively have blown your cover than you have with us here who know you only as Jeff Reynolds or Socrates. Specific acusations against Lou will have to come from an identifiable person, not from a pseudonym. Of course go ahead if you like. Your putting yourself permanently six feet under would not bother me in the slightest.

If this is all it would have taken to be permanently banned, you'd have been gone long ago...
Grow up jeffy!!

[kola]

wheres the love?

[dewey189]

So far this morning I have had to deal with four seperate issues in the Science in the News forum. For such a small group of people you all produce twice as much grief for moderators than does the entire Current Events forum.Their infighting, name-calling, disinfo agent outing, gossip-mongering and junior high "be on MY side" pleas, is about as far from "Science" as you can get. Most of the chemtrail-related threads could be moved to a new section entitled "environmental gossip mill" and science will have suffered no harm.

[Fair &Balanced Who Ca]

Their infighting, name-calling, disinfo agent outing, gossip-mongering and junior high "be on MY side" pleas, is about as far from "Science" as you can get. Most of the chemtrail-related threads could be moved to a new section entitled "environmental gossip mill" and science will have suffered no harm.

There's a science discussion going on here?

We should have a section for that. :D

[Jeff Reynolds]

Their infighting, name-calling, disinfo agent outing, gossip-mongering and junior high "be on MY side" pleas, is about as far from "Science" as you can get. Most of the chemtrail-related threads could be moved to a new section entitled "environmental gossip mill" and science will have suffered no harm.

Whatever Dewey189. You seem to be backtracking on your observations of deliberate sky tampering going on from a while back. You have to be very naive to believe that there isn't such a thing as astroturfing. My "disinfo agent outing" has been spot on. It is people like yourself who have been the problem all these years, with your head in the sand attitude as to the aerosol operations.

What you are doing is falling in line with the BroomStick. It is a disinfo tactic to turn everything into an enigma. But you keep making your thousands of shallow, one-sentence posts at a website well-known for name calling. It is because of the very shallow nature of people like yourself, that the astroturfers have been able to manipulate masses of people.

Google netvocates or the rendon group. Then ask yourself why the chemtrail forums are a joke. You are coming across as being a "concern troll."

[CDsNuTz]

Welcome to the "LIARS" club, Dewey..

[halva]

Their infighting, name-calling, disinfo agent outing, gossip-mongering and junior high "be on MY side" pleas, is about as far from "Science" as you can get. Most of the chemtrail-related threads could be moved to a new section entitled "environmental gossip mill" and science will have suffered no harm.

But Dewey, why don't you identify who is responsible for ALL of this??? In cases of disagreement at Science in the News you have a record of taking sides with precisely the people who (i) start the fights and then (ii) whine to the moderators that others are threatening them, need to be kicked off or whatever. Admittedly it has been the "debunkers" who have been the root cause of the problems in the Science in the News threads. We have learned to deal with them on our own, without assistance from the moderators. But there are others who choose to accuse almost everyone else of being secretly in league with "the debunkers". They wreak havoc in the threads with their stupid policy of unsubstantiated accusation. You have a record of being indulgent towards them, Dewey, until it is too late to do anything about it, you are repelled by the chaos and forget the change in your own views that has taken place as a result of exposure to the Science in the News threads.

[dewey189]

I'm all done with this chemtrail gossip mill and have moved on to more academic sites. See ya.

[halva]

Hope you take your newfound knowledge on "chemtrails" to the "academics".