speculative antho

[]2epo]v[an]

I wouldn't doubt it if much of the bible is based on an older human ancestors mythology. like say, john the Baptist was a Bigfoot.

the thumpers often make the question that if we weren’t specifically chosen by god to rape and pillage the world then why are we the only animal that walks upright.

while i don’t know about the first part i can answer why we walk upright. "that fuckin sand is hot!" many animals in the animal kingdom when finding them selves walking on sand will use only 2 paws. the ones that didn't, didn't get fucked by the ladies because they were seen as stupid for having 4 burnt paws.

I’m thinking our ancestors, 4 legged monkeys, found escape from predators by finding ways to live in the desert. in doing so adapted past their ecological gifts of claws and such.

humans found their niche by learning to use more than their claws and teeth. they learned to make claws and teeth instead of having sex with the ones that had the biggest claws and teeth.

another question they pose is, "why are there domesticated animals." while anyone with a 21st century education couls amswer that, I’d like to point out something not considered yet and more likely than the traditional camp fire explanation for the dogs domestication. they came along for the menstruation. they were originally women’s best friend. :)

ladies, why do i always hear that having services preformed on you during your menstrual cycle is more enjoyable? after a while it's possible that sexually transmitted diseases were linked to the ingestion of menstrual juices. so there was an abundant supply of menstrual fluid no longer being consumed by the male counterparts. that’s where dogs came along.

this also explains how in the story of adam and eve it speaks of eve going off on her own and having sex with animals.

:)

no holds barred

[]2epo]v[an]

sorry but you know it is true.

[jayreynolds]

This one is of no redeeming value, but................

[sISTER nOVENA]

Congratulations: this is officially the stupid f*cking thread I've ever read on this forum. And I don't say that lightly -- yous had some stiff competition, my friend. But youd overcome the natural obstacles posed by the capacious vacuum of "conservative thought" and posted something so utterly devoid of merit, common sense or rational thought that the trophy, I think, is yous forever. After this thread, I will forever picture yous as a toddler blissfully playing with a lump of its own sh*t. Were that the rules us a way to ban people for being a f*cking embarrassment to liberalism. There are websites expressly for people with fetishes like that, where you can imagine and expound upon any unlikely scenario yous fancy. In the future, please have the decency to pony up a credit card number at one of those "fine" establishments in support of your weird habit, and refrain from using this forum as a depository for yous furtive wanking material.
We don't want in on whatever it is yous doing.

[]2epo]v[an]

the mark of intelligence is being able to recognize it, while possessing it. you fail this

completely. not only cant you maintain rational debate, but you also completely lost your

ability to stay on topic. your brief moment of disgust clouds your ability to realize the

truth that predators would zero in on pools of menstruation. eventually one of them thought

it'd be a good idea and grant these food giving women the same level of affection they

granted each other. say hello to a nameless arctic wolf, first of our k9 friends. since then

the poor bastards have been little more than slaves. I guess that’s what you get for doing

something nice for the children of john. so tell me sister novena. are you in complete

opposition to evolution?

seems like I’ve rooted out myself an infiltrater. that’s ok though, all the liberal elite

politicians are. you'll do well. its really quite sad.

I’d like to tell you about a raving lunatic who wrote undeniably disgusting material and in

doing so helped free the sexually oppressed victim’s of church and society while at the same

time doing the same degree of damage to the emotionally handicapped like yourself. so far

its been a win win win. while i do not begrudge your fundamentally flawed religion, besides

its sexually oppressive mind twisting habits and even though it now owns the rights to

"BLOOD RED" by Slayer. you are right that this is too true to be taught.

if you believe in evolution you have to believe menstruation was once part of the hominid

diet. no amount of self contempt or disgust will change that. the question is, who would it

help for you to know?

hag!

i wonder if jesus was psycotic. but what did it change? if accepting that trophy distences

myself from naysaying haggs like you i will accept it greatfuly. and i really couldn't give

two shlts about what the fukk you care to remember........

[jayreynolds]

still no redeeeming value....................

[]2epo]v[an]

see...... that’s the problem.

I already admit its extremely speculative. even derived partially from czykotic episodes.

but so far all opposition to it has been to simply reduce it to value terms.

no matter how many times you call it valueless, useless, or wrong, it wont change the fact that none of you have been able to put up an argument against it.

lmfao at jay renolds.
"still no redeeming value...................."
that’s right jay. keep it to "VALUES."

i win <3

mike malloy's ("http://www.mikemalloy.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=31498)-

no holds barred ("http://www.nhbradio.com/Interact/Forums/tabid/58/forumid/4/threadid/924/threadpage/1/scope/posts/Default.aspx)-

http://brokensaints.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5453&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

[]2epo]v[an]

originaly posted by deathjester

Okay, since you want a response so badly, i'll bite.

]2epo]v[an wrote:
I wouldn't doubt it if much of the bible is based on an older human ancestors mythology. like say, john the Baptist was a Bigfoot.



Okay, valid opinion. I assume the rest of your response will elaborate on this...


Quote:
the thumpers often make the question that if we weren’t specifically chosen by god to rape and pillage the world then why are we the only animal that walks upright.

while i don’t know about the first part i can answer why we walk upright. "that fuckin sand is hot!" many animals in the animal kingdom when finding them selves walking on sand will use only 2 paws. the ones that didn't, didn't get fucked by the ladies because they were seen as stupid for having 4 burnt paws.

I’m thinking our ancestors, 4 legged monkeys, found escape from predators by finding ways to live in the desert. in doing so adapted past their ecological gifts of claws and such.

humans found their niche by learning to use more than their claws and teeth. they learned to make claws and teeth instead of having sex with the ones that had the biggest claws and teeth.



...Guess not. If you don't know about the first part, why did you post it?

As for actual comments, you simply stated what Darwin theorized 150 years ago. Humans were once monkeys and we evolved to adapt to our surrounds. Someone could easily toss in the whole "intelligent design" argument to counter your thoughts. I believe more in evolution, but I'm just being the devil's advocate here. And don't kangaroos hop around upright? They don't seem to pillage and rape.


Quote:

another question they pose is, "why are there domesticated animals." while anyone with a 21st century education couls amswer that, I’d like to point out something not considered yet and more likely than the traditional camp fire explanation for the dogs domestication. they came along for the menstruation. they were originally women’s best friend.

ladies, why do i always hear that having services preformed on you during your menstrual cycle is more enjoyable? after a while it's possible that sexually transmitted diseases were linked to the ingestion of menstrual juices. so there was an abundant supply of menstrual fluid no longer being consumed by the male counterparts. that’s where dogs came along.


Yet another unrelated topic. Pick a central thought, and stick with it. Otherwise, its not an argument. Like Otaku said before, this is just a monologue of your random thoughts.

Anyways...
The whole idea of men drinking menstrual blood seems kind of flawed to me. Early man didn't know what STDs were, so the whole notion of man abruptly stopping this sort of activity doesn't make sense. Hell, it seems like its hardcoded into our DNA to find a woman's period disgusting. Look at how the old testament treats women when they're on their period. Even now, do you ever feel truly comfortable buying tampons for a girl?

As for man domesticating animals for the sole purpose of licking a woman's cooter... no. Humans primary concern was to not die, and domesticated animals were needed for survival. Just because you hear about shepherds having sex with sheep, doesn't mean that humans learned how to herd sheep for the sole purpose of fucking them.


Quote:
this also explains how in the story of adam and eve it speaks of eve going off on her own and having sex with animals.





This still makes no connection to any overall argument. There's also stories about Satan having sex with Saddam Hussein, but mentioning it without any sort of context renders it useless.

[]2epo]v[an]

the first part ties into the last. time bomb. didn’t wanna spend to much time with religious speculation. bad memories anyway.

evolution is intelligent design. and they became according to their kind. if you ate nuts your descendents that did the best nut digestion, lived to the next level of evolution of nut eaters. no idea why people don’t grasp this.

but the kangaroo hasn't had to survive being removed from its habitat. to the contrary they've enjoyed blissful seclusion from any need to adapt any further.

when a dog gets sick in a pack, the rest of them usually all die off, do to, the level of affection they give one another to ensure harmony. with humans, it wasn’t a risk, besides the outcome.

not for the soul purpose, but for the reason they couldn’t get rid of them, as if they would want to. and they would have killed the first person that told them the future of it, as well as telling them to avoid it. especially if they were vengeful.

they really are hypocrites all the way around. nice shepherd theory. lets look at that again sometime. did I ever meet saddam Hussein? I remember being protected by a lion. I also remember a lawyers happiest day. he had me sign something, then jumped out of the helicopter door. and no. I don’t think he had a parachute. he was happy because he just had me sign something that gave his family a whole shit load of money. knowing what he would have to do to forget he opted for the other way of forgeting. now knowing what that method was and how angree it subcontiosly made me, i would have dove out after him. urainium mind wipe, how horrably brilliant is that? they said here we're gonna iradiate your brain with this so we may as well let you play with it.