PDA

View Full Version : Moderators, please review this on fritz the cat.


PED
04-29-2004, 04:07 PM
As of the time I undertook to compile this list, there were 10 pages of searchable posts where fritz mentions Katie or Katie’s. Posting them all would be time consuming, but I have read them all and post the first responses made by fritz to or about Katie to prove he does troll her to harass and malign her. Nowhere in Katie’s posts to which fritz first maligns her does she mention him. For space the comments have been compressed. First responses are below.

As you can see from the first post noted, as well as two later fritz makes no secret of why he is on this board. It is one thing to flame others and be flamed back, quite another to make it one’s sole purpose to be here to do so, and as such I request that fritz is made to respect Katie’s wishes and refrain from commenting about her or to her, or lose his privileges on this forum.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=64815#64815 –

Kim- I come here because it is fun to watch people flounder around a take this place soooo seriously.

I like the sport of unfolding Gerry's lies. I like to watch teh fights. I like to be a smart ass. I like to talk about polotics..and I am very interested in the actions of people. Fun for the whole family here.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=54127#54127 –About Katie

take this stupid line of reasoning and stick it up your collective liberal asses. What a bunch of fucking punks. You defend katie's, childish asinine ignorance and her hypocritical line of reasoning......by pointing out she never killed anyone with her lies. So, lies are ok, as long as no one gets killed? You people are so fucking dumb and so fucking smug and so fucking wrong. THE LOT OF YOU. Christ on a cross what a bunch of pandering excuse making assholes we have on this board. Point Blank- Katie bitches ALL day long about her rights being takern away and protesters getting quieted and their free speech getting silenced etc., yet she doesn't understand that trying to stifle Syd's free speech is the same thing.

And none of you fiucking tiured ass liberals have enough guts to point it out to her.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=58022#58022 – About Katie

You are right though Gerry, there are more family members on this board.... The Rodeo family. Katie is my little retarded sister (call her special or she'll throw a tantrum). She eats crayons and likes to lift her dress up in public. Kentay is my oddball grandpa in the final stages of senility. He thinks he was a decorated soldier in many foreign wars, the only real service he did was bell ringing for the Salivation Army. Patriot is my zany Auntie that brings Jello and fruit loop molds to all the family parties. She has a cat named Princess Poo that is the sole benefactor of her estate. Joe Dawson is my angry cousin that has been on house arrest for the last 4 years for beating up a drug store cashier for refusing to take 2 Susan B. Anthony coins for payment on his Xanax scrip.

Josey Whales is the families token closet homosexual militant. We are all here, Gerry ,to fuck with you.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=61495#61495 – About Katie

Gerry is shopping for a new sheet and hood, and katie is gonna try to buy a clue. Should be a fun trip.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=65617#65617 – About Katie

I think it is hilarious that vain ass Gerry had a conversation with Katie on a shopping trip about how much she looked like a prettier version of Angela Landsbury. DId you guys buy the new Jessica Simpson CD or did you go straight to BeBe and try on the new low cut jeans?

Did anyone get murdered in the mall, Gerry? DId you have to solve the case (in under and hour)?

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=66984#66984 – To Katie

My Sign- Aquarias.

Katie's sign: Will Work For Food

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=68057#68057 – To Katie

Awwww and Katie the wonder slob showes up to grace us all with her superior wit and uncanny ability to make no sense what-so-ever. Come on you liberal fucking losers...jump on the bandwagon... there is another thread with another issue that you won't take the time to grasp or understand.... all you have to do is show up and stick up for whatever liberal left asshole is getting his/her ass kicked again for posting a bunch of bullshit and lies. Nevermind admitting how fucking foolish the topic and assertations are, you have a job to do, save your drowning left buddy.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=80420#80420 – To Katie Thu Apr 08, 2004 12:45 pm
Katie-

Nice timeline...but so what? He got a memo which, according to Condi, was data relating to things that had already happened and had no new infomration in it? What is you point?
(please answer this time, instead of saying something that makes no sense and then hiding away..please)

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=80466#80466 – To Katie same thread Thu Apr 08, 2004 2:07 pm

Katie- absent as always. Dash in. Leave a post. hide form the questions. Shallow shallow dumb Katie.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=84479#84479 – About Katie

Biederman- It is a shame that Katie is a fucking moron and nothing she types makes any sense. It is a shame that you shameless liberals tried to hide her stupidity by claiming her hand injury was the cause. It is a shame that you are too fucking slow to realize I never busted on Katie for her typing; I made fun of her for her lack of brain cells. It is a smaller shame that, in my haste, I rely greatly on spell checkers when I produce documents and it has made me somewhat of a bad speller.

And it is a further shame that I care so little of most of you here (read: would let you burn to death while I saved your dog from a house fire) that I don't care enough to be perfect in my posts. I care when it makes me money...this place doesn't fit that category. But...you can usually get the point (well most people, that aren't as fucking dense as you) But, thank your for the help, assface. P.S. Don't think I haven't noticed that you have switched to grammar Nazi-ing with me as of late. I figure you know you can't hang with me on the debate front...you'd get your pussy little ass kicked again and again. If I were you, I stick with the grammar, thereby you don't have to lose another debate and it helps me be more conscious of my typos.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=84623#84623 – About Katie

Gawd, Biederman....now you are stretching. I have always claimed to be a dick. You got smashed tonight because you thought you'd be a smart guy and play "correct Fritz's grammar and spelling". Then you mistakenly thought I cut on Katie for her typing (which was wrong). Then you compared me to her and insinuated that I was the poor grammarian and she was just fine. Then-- She came in and made a million errors, just in time to make you eat your words. You continued to mistakenly think I had pointed out her grammar in the past.
Then you were warned, if you rip on people for grammar, you had better make sure yours was perfect. Then, 10 minutes later you made a grammatical error. Then you flopped around not understanding your error. Then you changed the subject.

You look like a fool. And you friends aren't helping the cause. Katie keeps making blundering errors and PED is trying to cover her mistakes by calling them "super intelligent deep posts". It is a circus and you are the clowns.


http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=84904#84904 – To and about Katie

M- As apposed to Katie who copies an article..posts it..never discussed it. Hides when she is asked questions...and then hopes and prays her little jokes will get her by until someone comes in and diverts attention from her. LOL.
What do you want me to comment on...and article that outlines stuff we have already discussed over the last 2 weeks.
Too bad Katie is too lazy to comment herself or at least edit the cut and paste to leave out the extraneous bullshit surrounding the article.
Hell, she has even posted articles within 4 minutes of them being released.. which tells me..she is a headline reader in search of any and all that bashes the BA...regardless of what the content is. Why should I comment about the article.. Katie isn’t equipped to engage anyone in a discussion about it. She just cuts and pastes and leaves…all day long.


P.S. I have asked her straight forward questions about MANY of her articles...the bitch doesn't have the decency to even answer people.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=84941#84941 – About Katie

PED- Yet another laughable post. Yes, I am in love with Katie. I am seeking a slow minded pig bitch to round out my life. Nah. I just pick on Katie because it is too easy and it lures you suck up assholes in for a bit of fun. You, PED, MTHeroy, Biederman....you are all protecting your little retarded sister and I like slapping the hell out of you guys when you come around.
Tell me more of your theories....I bet you studied psychology at the same correspondence school as Gerry "You hate me because I threaten you" The Dutch Wonder.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=85397#85397 – About Katie a promise… Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:06 am

M-Theory, PED...et al. I will take some advice and attempt to start a civil dialogue with Katie about her article. I have posted my questions and a few comment s on her article in the hopes that she will answer them. If the usual pattern remains true...she will not. She will rely on one of you to come in and flame me..therby breaking down the thread...diverting the attention from the questions..and allowing you to further blame me for disrupting the forum.

I truly hope she answers my post.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=85404#85404 – About Katie 6 minutes later…Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:22 am

Kim- I am a downer and you are a slow minded follower. The people you post with here on a daily basis are what drives me to treat them like this...and you refuse to see that. You can sit back and watch people like FB call all cons slime bag motherfuckers, you can watch Katie resort to penis-size and homosexual jokes, you can watch PED and M_Theory break into vulgar name calling rants.....yet when I do those things...It is a crime...you are biased and jaded and your rules on apply to a certain set of people. Oh Well.

BTW- Again you speak out of your ass. I never said I was a Big Important Guy. I said I was very good at what I do. I make good money doing what I am good at...selling. I am very efficient

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=87574#87574 – About Katie
Harcoprs-- Katie doesn't know. Wait until Biederman gets here...he'll try to explain the answers to your questions of Katie (as he alwyas tries)...although they'll be off the mark and full of shit.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=88481#88481 – To Katie

why don't you just call him a nigger lover, katie?

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=88865#88865 – To Katie

Katie- Glad you could breeze in and make no sesne, again. Now tell us, why should Tami still have her job?

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=90792#90792 – About Katie

Mykel- Again little victim boy--- I don't have to like all gay people or even think homosexual sex is not distasteful to me to believe that there are certain rights that should not be taken from a person because of his sexual orientation. I work with homosexuals that I am friends with and I work with homosexuals that I think are stereotypical bitch boy fags. I work with herteros that I am friends with and I work with some that I think are stereotypical asshole dickheads. I don't usually try to be too aware of which sex a person is attracted to when I have contact with them at work or in a social setting. I do not have the tell-tale hang-ups that you so dilligently search for in everyone you speak to...hoping to play your trump to.

So what is your point.? Yes, I feel you'd give a blowjob to a hairy biker for $5 because I don't think you have an ounce of class or common sense....Just as I think Katie would blow a trucker for $3 and pack of Kools.

Yes I called you a twink. You called me a mamas boy. I won't hold back from giving you shit when you give me shit. The difference is, you little bitch, you'll pull the "gay card" out all day long when it suits you. Guess what? I don't give a shit. You should stop acting like every conversation you have with a person is their first encounter with a homosexual in conversation. Give it up. Do you want to know who pushes the "gay stereotype" more than anybody here? You, motherfucker....you. You want to be considered as normal as the next guy when it suits you (we worry about bills, etc.) and you want to act like a flaming gay cowboy when it suits you (the men are juicy...blah blah blah). You want to be unassuming and blend when it suits you and you want to be flamboyant and shocking when it suits you.
See a pattern here? You pimp your personalities out in order to get the desired reaction. You fawn and flop around trying to be the victim when you feel like you need attention. And you harp and grate an act like a militant when you are angry at the world.

Mykel, you are as see-through as the condoms you SHOULD be using.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=92220#92220 – To Katie

Katie- You are a propoganda whore. You could care less about this little boy. You just want to shoot daggers at Syd. Someone needs to kick your teeth down your throat and bury you alive in a shallow grave. Fuck you, you god damn bitch.

I hope you burn in hell for using that poor child's picture as a fucking tool to attack a person on a fucking forum. People like you truly deserve the fate this child had to endure.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=92681#92681 – To Katie

Kaite- If you are trying to say you didn't spell it worng...then change it...then you would be lying. I busted you at 10:12 (by this clock) and you redacted at 10:13...

two_iron
04-30-2004, 12:06 AM
OK, moPED, I've reviewed your complaint and decided the following:








































http://mike.reed.org/media/crying_baby.jpg











and you wonder why all Americans think canucks are chickenshits?



<snicker>.....please try to find your balls and re-attach them with a nail gun or any other available method....

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 06:09 AM
PED-

LOL. This is really good stuff. Shall we compile a list of Katie's chasing of Syd? Or how about her long list of penis size posts? How about we post a few of her more colorful "you should have been aborted" references?

I know, I know....how aobut you quit wasting you time, be a man, and stop pretending to be the White Knight fora bit.

How about that?

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 06:36 AM
Now I ask you, PED....

Why would a person complaining about being trolled....willingly post about the person they claim is trolling them? Why would they knowling post about that person, in a thread that the person is participating? LOL. Ever think that Katie isn't smart enough to help you out, PED. You spent your time and effort making a case against me for trolling...and our childlike gimp Katie can't help herselft but make you look foolish by proving that she brings it all upon herself. Hmmmmm. I think she is flirting with me.

Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:29 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you were hesitant about judging fritzy by his usual posts,ONE MUST ADD delusional to the list of ,vicious and INANE adjectives describing his verbal diharea.
_________________
All the flowers of all the tomorrows,are in the seeds of today(anon)

PED
04-30-2004, 09:55 AM
Now I ask you, PED....

Why would a person complaining about being trolled....willingly post about the person they claim is trolling them? Why would they knowling post about that person, in a thread that the person is participating? LOL. Ever think that Katie isn't smart enough to help you out, PED. You spent your time and effort making a case against me for trolling...and our childlike gimp Katie can't help herselft but make you look foolish by proving that she brings it all upon herself. Hmmmmm. I think she is flirting with me.

Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:29 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you were hesitant about judging fritzy by his usual posts,ONE MUST ADD delusional to the list of ,vicious and INANE adjectives describing his verbal diharea.
_________________
All the flowers of all the tomorrows,are in the seeds of today(anon)


You obviously expect fritz, that Katie should sit back and take your constant attacks on her. As much as you might feel you have the right to post whatever you want, you do not have the right to consistently attack someone especially when she has asked you to stop it. And she has every right to respond back.

I have provided posts that prove where you are the one going after Katie, not vice-versa. I also have provided previously your first 3 of 4 posts in here which showed that you initiated attacks on myself and M-Theory using invective that was uncalled for. In fact, the moderators need only look up your posts and they will see for themselves that you have done this to every single person you disagree with. Not once did you attempt to debate the point!

You have been told by several on here that you do this and yet you continue on excusing yourself for doing so by claiming you are a dick. It get's frigging tiresome since obviously your only intent is to drive the posters away. If the moderators don't care who stays and who goes that will happen, and has happened.


It is time for you to get off Katie's case. In six months you have not convinced anyone on the left that she is what you claim, you beat a dead horse. It is time for you to respect her wishes and stop engaging her.

PED
04-30-2004, 09:57 AM
OK, moPED, I've reviewed your complaint and decided the following:

Holding fritz hand duh_fer? Are you dick to his bush?







































http://mike.reed.org/media/crying_baby.jpg











and you wonder why all Americans think canucks are chickenshits?



<snicker>.....please try to find your balls and re-attach them with a nail gun or any other available method....

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 10:11 AM
You obviously expect fritz, that Katie should sit back and take your constant attacks on her. As much as you might feel you have the right to post whatever you want, you do not have the right to consistently attack someone especially when she has asked you to stop it. And she has every right to respond back

No, PED, I expect that Katie be an adult and answer questions about her posts with a little more than a penis joke and an abortion comment.

I expect that when a person cries about being a victim..that they actually ARE A VICTIM.

I expect that people who feel like they are trolled to not incite the very same people they accuse.

I expect, people like you to take their left hand off their left eye and see how people from BOTH sides on this forum run around doing the very thing you like to accuse me off...INCLUDING and ESPECIALLY KATIE.

Even today...Katie has mentioned me in 3 thread...UNPROVOKED. She is making a fool of you for taking up her false plight while she can't help herself from continuing to lay the bait and egg on the attacks.

You have got yourself a pseudo-victim on your hands PED...and you look foolish for taking up for her.

If I were you, I would have PM'd her and told her exactly how dumb she looks by feigning discomfort while begging for the attention at the same time.

Get real PED...you are no do-gooder. You are just another schmuck making a fool of himself. But as long as you don't stoop toe Esbe's tactics of describing sexaul things you want to do to me, we'll be all good.

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 10:23 AM
Not once did you attempt to debate the point


Oh really.....

Katie-

I do not understand what the issue is here.

1. Bush does not make the rules and regulations for the Dept. of Agriculture. He can and may work with them to change policy. I would like to know why you think ANYTHING the govt. does (any one of the 1000's of agencies) that you disagree with is a "BUSH" thing. Katie there are 1000's of govt. agencies that have had rules and policies and agendas for years and years and years...the POTUS doesn’t not know all these rules, run these organizations, or make their policies. In fact, if this beef issue becomes big enough to warrant the BA's attention, it would take a lot of red tape to get a change made.

Is your understanding of the way a govt. works this convoluted?

2. Do you or the other know anything more about the process to test animals than the article outlines? Do you think there could be reasons why the govt. regulates the testing products and facilities? Did it cross the author or your mind that possible the Dept of Ag. Isn’t willing to let a small company just buy a kit, build a facility and test because there is quality issue that need to be taken into account.

3. What would happen if the govt. let any person with the money buy the kit and say they were a beef tester? Is there a very big risk to the beef industry if a non-qualified company does testing and allows another infected cow out?

4. Did you or the author sit down and think about what possible reasons the Dept. of Ag. Would have to regulate this type of business practice?

5. Did you sit down and think about how long these kits have been around and how long the Dept. of Ag. Has had a rule that stipulates only they can do the testing? (I didn't ask about the author this time because it is you that asserted this was a bush thing).

6. Did you also sit back and think about your thread title? It has a false conclusion in it. No one is banning testing of beef for mad cow, they are regulating it.


Now some other comments--


Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:54 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maria-

Because Hung had charisma and he was really funny....and it was more of a lark.. American Idol gave him lessons and had him on the show again...the rest of his popularity has happened WITHOUT American Idol
's influence....in fact he is more popular than the Idol finalists...which most likely burns them up.


Here is the deal, Mykel, I don't think it is racists at all...it is America backing an underdog and damning the man...the reality TV man. The regular world is saying...screw American Idol..and you made up pop starts that just add to the dismal abyss that we call music today. We CAN and WILL defeat you by making one of your rejects MORE POPULAR than your winner. It'll ruin you and set the world back on a closer course to normalcy.



Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 12:02 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Woody-

According to Katie..gthe baby has to be happy and nurtured for it to be worthy of living.

I on the other hand, support the pro-choice movement...but also think there has to be a decided and agreed to timeframe during pregnancy in which it becomes a non-path based on life of a child.



Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2004 7:51 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mickster--

Very dishonest of you. They are unrelated issues. We owe it to ourselves to figure out who Kerry is..before we vote. By continueing to compare him to Bush and Bush's actions all you are doing is trying to cover his flaws.

Let people see Kerry for who he is and then..vote who they feel is the better man.


As it stands...the two issues are of different magnitudes...but the size of one does not make the other a non-issue.

And you know this.


Biederman-

You missed the point entirely. Kerry had his reason to do whatever he did back then..and I will never begrudge him that. Kerry also has every right to flip-flop with regard to issues over time-- we all change our views on things....but it is the tell-tale signs of lying NOW that bothert me. It is the use fo semantics to deflect and divert from being cornered that bothers me.

I am not bothered that Kerry threw medals over a fernce in protest..they were his medals and ribbons and he is free to do with them as he pleases.

My issue is with his daily changing story and failed attempts at semantic trickery...it tlells me he isn't and honest man.

Does that mean Bush is honest and he isn't? Nope. Does that mean I have a "level on honesty" quagmire to get through when I make my voting decisions? Yes.


Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 5:32 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cricket and PED-

Singling out the Kerry claims and setting aside GWB for a few seconds.

You both have to admit, it isn't very comforting knowing that the alternative to Bush seems to be fond of lying and making up stories himself....

All-be-it that they aren't YET as big of lies as GWB gets bashed for.

They are still lies. And they still show the US yet ANOTHER man that isn't above making up falsehoods while seeking to get your votes.

It is all pretty shameful.


Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 4:02 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is the question here? she broke policy, she gets fired. I visit many companies as a contractor and they all have specific rules and regulations I have to follow. If I break those rules, it voids my contract and I am essentially fired.

You guys are confusing the issue. Tami did not get fired for taking pictures of coffins and exposing the BA...she got fired for breaking a rule set forth by her employer.

The rule is there, you can not deny that. She broke the rule, you can not deny that. she got fired...it all makes sense to me.

You act as if President Bush picked up a phone and said "fire that woman that made me look bad". No. it was more like the company she was working for got pissed that she broke policy and got rid of her. I would have fired her too...she broke the rules.


Quote:
Fritz -

I suppose in your mind I fit into the "et al" category, but without trying to fill in for Katie, I'd like to throw out a couple of things.


You indeed are the "et and the "al" in "et al".

Quote:
Your items 2 through 5 are, for the most part, answered in the body of the article. Creekstone Farms isn't proposing to have Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel slop cow-juice and chemicals from one test tube to another. As the article clearly states, their testing would be "under the auspices of an academic lab that the USDA has approved for mad cow testing."


No where did I say that Creekstone would not have the right processes in place, or the right people doing the testing. They did decide to build the facility without knowing whether or not they would be allowed to do the testing. Do you really find fault with the USDA for wanting to maintane a controlled environment and a regulated testing procedures in which, for the sake of integrity of results, want their people doing the testing?

Quote:
The USDA's position as outlined is that testing certain animals is enough, not that testing all animals is bad science. I would assume that they are hoping to limit the cost to the industry of testing on the scale that Creekstone Farms proposes. Of course, Creekstone Farms isn't openly trying to change the industry; they're attempting to voluntarily improve the perception of the quality of their product.


I think they are also trying to do damage control. Mad Cow is not an epidemic here in the USA. It has cropped up a few places and from what I have read we are going to great measure to try and avoid any more occurrences. The last thing the beef industry needs is one of their own using the trumped up threat of Mad Cow as a selling point against competitor. Sure, it'll make them rich, but it will make the products of other producers suffer based on possible false perceptions regarding its safety. The USDA is using its power to insure that the entire industries needs are taken into consideration....NOT just the sales dreams of one company.

To say that the USDA is acting nefarious in this matter is to assume that they have something to gain by allowing a Mad Cow epidemic to start here..and that thought is preposterous.

Quote:
The argument seems to be that the USDA is protecting the industry from the interests of its consumers and from a particular company which has found a way to satisfy the concerns of some of its consumers. And the net effect is to block certain testing in the US.


It is not blocking certain testing in the US. It is regulating who does the testing and what testing methods are used (including sample size). And it is managing that testing in a way that they feel insure the safely of our beef AND not cause undue panicking that could rock the US Beef Market.



Now, Biederman, let me ask you a question. Do you feel that Katie's title both embodied the content of the article and was fair in its claims? Honestly

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 10:25 AM
you beat a dead horse.

Katie isn't dead.

PED
04-30-2004, 01:39 PM
You obviously expect fritz, that Katie should sit back and take your constant attacks on her. As much as you might feel you have the right to post whatever you want, you do not have the right to consistently attack someone especially when she has asked you to stop it. And she has every right to respond back

No, PED, I expect that Katie be an adult and answer questions about her posts with a little more than a penis joke and an abortion comment.

I expect that when a person cries about being a victim..that they actually ARE A VICTIM.

What you expect and what you get from your posts are two different things. Obviously you are a very confused person if you believe that using bullying tactics and immediately attacking someone by degrading them personally will result in their answering questions that you did not even post, or want to debate with you when you have not enetered into debate.


I expect that people who feel like they are trolled to not incite the very same people they accuse.

Again I say to you then, that you fully expect to be able to troll and degrade others and they should shit down and shut up! Your thinking is representative of something missing in your upbringing regarding give and take.

I expect, people like you to take their left hand off their left eye and see how people from BOTH sides on this forum run around doing the very thing you like to accuse me off...INCLUDING and ESPECIALLY KATIE.

And I expect people like you to do exactly the same and not just immediately jump in and attack people like me and M-Theory who did not even mention your name or post to you. you have some God complex going on here and cannot see that exactly what you say you don't want you do and initiate. YTou have been proven a liar by me whenn I showed the first 2 posts made in this forum which were assaults by you on me, and obviously since they were your first and second, I had no previous communication with you.

Then you expect me to do what, sit back and take it? Not bloody likely!

Even today...Katie has mentioned me in 3 thread...UNPROVOKED. She is making a fool of you for taking up her false plight while she can't help herself from continuing to lay the bait and egg on the attacks.

Until the moderators remove you from this forum or forbid you from attacking Katie, she has every right to do what she is doing. And you make an ass of yourself if you think she is making a fool of me or I took up a false plight.

You have got yourself a pseudo-victim on your hands PED...and you look foolish for taking up for her.

If I were you, I would have PM'd her and told her exactly how dumb she looks by feigning discomfort while begging for the attention at the same time.

Fortunately for me you are not me, nor have you any clue what lies behind the scenes. And if this is a ploy which I doubt you have the smarts to think of, to get information, F O R G E T IT! You get nothing!

Get real PED...you are no do-gooder. You are just another schmuck making a fool of himself. But as long as you don't stoop toe Esbe's tactics of describing sexaul things you want to do to me, we'll be all good.

Coming from a slug like you, I take that as a compliment, you should at least aspire to climb to my level. What is that a threat? Are you planning on poking your grimey fist thru my monitor? Do you ever see what you say to others? Obviously not. You want to fuck them, fuck theoir mothers, fuck their daughters and kill them among other things.

What the hell kind of low class, immoral gutter were you raised in anyway that you delude yourself into thnking that your hate filled words are any better than that which you get back?

Get a grip!

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 01:45 PM
LOL.

PED. Go away little boy. Heal thyself before you go on a road show to try and heal others.

Katie will continue to be asked questions about her posts, as it is my right (freedoms and all, you know those things?), and when Katie gets nasty, as she usually does..I will be nasty in repsonse. The point of the matter is this....Katie likes to be mean...when Katie gets it right back..katie runs and cries..all the while still firing back...and you are a fool for trying to ignore that.

Grow up PED...quit flirting on the net and pay attention to your wife.

You are an ineffictive little twirp and you make me laugh.

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 01:46 PM
You want to fuck them, fuck theoir mothers, fuck their daughters and kill them among other things.

classic PED manufacturing of facts. LOL. Shameless lying little boy.

PED
04-30-2004, 01:51 PM
You prove my point. Only after you were spoken to about your behavior to Katie, and six minutes later you went after her again, as initially posted by me. Yet you failed to provide the opening of this post

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=85397#85397

M-Theory, PED...et al. I will take some advice and attempt to start a civil dialogue with Katie about her article. I have posted my questions and a few comment s on her article in the hopes that she will answer them. If the usual pattern remains true...she will not. She will rely on one of you to come in and flame me..therby breaking down the thread...diverting the attention from the questions..and allowing you to further blame me for disrupting the forum.

I truly hope she answers my post

Katie-

I do not understand what the issue is here.

1. Bush does not make the rules and regulations for the Dept. of Agriculture. He can and may work with them to change policy. I would like to know why you think ANYTHING the govt. does (any one of the 1000's of agencies) that you disagree with is a "BUSH" thing. Katie there are 1000's of govt. agencies that have had rules and policies and agendas for years and years and years...the POTUS doesn’t not know all these rules, run these organizations, or make their policies. In fact, if this beef issue becomes big enough to warrant the BA's attention, it would take a lot of red tape to get a change made.

Is your understanding of the way a govt. works this convoluted?

2. Do you or the other know anything more about the process to test animals than the article outlines? Do you think there could be reasons why the govt. regulates the testing products and facilities? Did it cross the author or your mind that possible the Dept of Ag. Isn’t willing to let a small company just buy a kit, build a facility and test because there is quality issue that need to be taken into account.

3. What would happen if the govt. let any person with the money buy the kit and say they were a beef tester? Is there a very big risk to the beef industry if a non-qualified company does testing and allows another infected cow out?

4. Did you or the author sit down and think about what possible reasons the Dept. of Ag. Would have to regulate this type of business practice?

5. Did you sit down and think about how long these kits have been around and how long the Dept. of Ag. Has had a rule that stipulates only they can do the testing? (I didn't ask about the author this time because it is you that asserted this was a bush thing).

6. Did you also sit back and think about your thread title? It has a false conclusion in it. No one is banning testing of beef for mad cow, they are regulating it.

Maria is not Katie is she? Mykel is not katie is he? Woody is not Katie is he? Micker is not Katie is he? Beiderman is not katie is he? And The only reason you are civil to me is that you also address your internet mother; cricket.

Foolish is the man who is his own lawyer fritz. get help. All the posts I supplied are first posts on threads by you, and in trying to defend yourself you offer 5 or so posts where not ONE is to Katie save after you agreed to be civil. And again, that lasted exavctly 6 minutes.

You did the same to Dawson, apologized and didn't learn anything from the lesson. I will not let this rest until Katie tells me to let it go or the moderators make it known to you that are to stay away from her.

Get it?



[/quote]

Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:54 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maria-

Because Hung had charisma and he was really funny....and it was more of a lark.. American Idol gave him lessons and had him on the show again...the rest of his popularity has happened WITHOUT American Idol
's influence....in fact he is more popular than the Idol finalists...which most likely burns them up.


Here is the deal, Mykel, I don't think it is racists at all...it is America backing an underdog and damning the man...the reality TV man. The regular world is saying...screw American Idol..and you made up pop starts that just add to the dismal abyss that we call music today. We CAN and WILL defeat you by making one of your rejects MORE POPULAR than your winner. It'll ruin you and set the world back on a closer course to normalcy.



Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 12:02 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Woody-

According to Katie..gthe baby has to be happy and nurtured for it to be worthy of living.

I on the other hand, support the pro-choice movement...but also think there has to be a decided and agreed to timeframe during pregnancy in which it becomes a non-path based on life of a child.



Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2004 7:51 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mickster--

Very dishonest of you. They are unrelated issues. We owe it to ourselves to figure out who Kerry is..before we vote. By continueing to compare him to Bush and Bush's actions all you are doing is trying to cover his flaws.

Let people see Kerry for who he is and then..vote who they feel is the better man.


As it stands...the two issues are of different magnitudes...but the size of one does not make the other a non-issue.

And you know this.


Biederman-

You missed the point entirely. Kerry had his reason to do whatever he did back then..and I will never begrudge him that. Kerry also has every right to flip-flop with regard to issues over time-- we all change our views on things....but it is the tell-tale signs of lying NOW that bothert me. It is the use fo semantics to deflect and divert from being cornered that bothers me.

I am not bothered that Kerry threw medals over a fernce in protest..they were his medals and ribbons and he is free to do with them as he pleases.

My issue is with his daily changing story and failed attempts at semantic trickery...it tlells me he isn't and honest man.

Does that mean Bush is honest and he isn't? Nope. Does that mean I have a "level on honesty" quagmire to get through when I make my voting decisions? Yes.


Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 5:32 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cricket and PED-

Singling out the Kerry claims and setting aside GWB for a few seconds.

You both have to admit, it isn't very comforting knowing that the alternative to Bush seems to be fond of lying and making up stories himself....

All-be-it that they aren't YET as big of lies as GWB gets bashed for.

They are still lies. And they still show the US yet ANOTHER man that isn't above making up falsehoods while seeking to get your votes.

It is all pretty shameful.


Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 4:02 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is the question here? she broke policy, she gets fired. I visit many companies as a contractor and they all have specific rules and regulations I have to follow. If I break those rules, it voids my contract and I am essentially fired.

You guys are confusing the issue. Tami did not get fired for taking pictures of coffins and exposing the BA...she got fired for breaking a rule set forth by her employer.

The rule is there, you can not deny that. She broke the rule, you can not deny that. she got fired...it all makes sense to me.

You act as if President Bush picked up a phone and said "fire that woman that made me look bad". No. it was more like the company she was working for got pissed that she broke policy and got rid of her. I would have fired her too...she broke the rules.


Quote:
Fritz -

I suppose in your mind I fit into the "et al" category, but without trying to fill in for Katie, I'd like to throw out a couple of things.


You indeed are the "et and the "al" in "et al".

Quote:
Your items 2 through 5 are, for the most part, answered in the body of the article. Creekstone Farms isn't proposing to have Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel slop cow-juice and chemicals from one test tube to another. As the article clearly states, their testing would be "under the auspices of an academic lab that the USDA has approved for mad cow testing."


No where did I say that Creekstone would not have the right processes in place, or the right people doing the testing. They did decide to build the facility without knowing whether or not they would be allowed to do the testing. Do you really find fault with the USDA for wanting to maintane a controlled environment and a regulated testing procedures in which, for the sake of integrity of results, want their people doing the testing?

Quote:
The USDA's position as outlined is that testing certain animals is enough, not that testing all animals is bad science. I would assume that they are hoping to limit the cost to the industry of testing on the scale that Creekstone Farms proposes. Of course, Creekstone Farms isn't openly trying to change the industry; they're attempting to voluntarily improve the perception of the quality of their product.


I think they are also trying to do damage control. Mad Cow is not an epidemic here in the USA. It has cropped up a few places and from what I have read we are going to great measure to try and avoid any more occurrences. The last thing the beef industry needs is one of their own using the trumped up threat of Mad Cow as a selling point against competitor. Sure, it'll make them rich, but it will make the products of other producers suffer based on possible false perceptions regarding its safety. The USDA is using its power to insure that the entire industries needs are taken into consideration....NOT just the sales dreams of one company.

To say that the USDA is acting nefarious in this matter is to assume that they have something to gain by allowing a Mad Cow epidemic to start here..and that thought is preposterous.

Quote:
The argument seems to be that the USDA is protecting the industry from the interests of its consumers and from a particular company which has found a way to satisfy the concerns of some of its consumers. And the net effect is to block certain testing in the US.


It is not blocking certain testing in the US. It is regulating who does the testing and what testing methods are used (including sample size). And it is managing that testing in a way that they feel insure the safely of our beef AND not cause undue panicking that could rock the US Beef Market.



Now, Biederman, let me ask you a question. Do you feel that Katie's title both embodied the content of the article and was fair in its claims? Honestly[/quote]

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 01:55 PM
PED-

Do you want to eat your words, punk?

I can find you over a dozen instances of threads started by Katie in which my open and forthright questions were answered with nastiness and personal attacks from her. It is my right, on this board to attack her logic, posts and lies..it is also my right to respond to nastiness with nastiness. Shall we cut and paste some of your rather charming moments? PED you hypocritcal bastard.

I WILL POST AS I PLEASE.

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 01:57 PM
You did the same to Dawson, apologized and didn't learn anything from the lesson. I will not let this rest until Katie tells me to let it go or the moderators make it known to you that are to stay away from her.

Get it?



LOL. Good for you Captain America.


Do what you need to do PED...I will continue to out her inane posts for their lack of honesty and logic.

Get it?

PED
04-30-2004, 02:23 PM
http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=92359#92359

Katie-

It shall be no secret. You are not a messenger you are a drama loving asshole who uses the death of others to attack Syd. You are a fake bitch with no true feelings.

And yes..I would rather see a picture of your dead body on a slab rather than this child's. So sue me, bitch.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=92220#92220

Katie-

You are a propoganda whore. You could care less about this little boy. You just want to shoot daggers at Syd. Someone needs to kick your teeth down your throat and bury you alive in a shallow grave. Fuck you, you god damn bitch.

I hope you burn in hell for using that poor child's picture as a fucking tool to attack a person on a fucking forum. People like you truly deserve the fate this child had to endure.

PED
04-30-2004, 02:25 PM
PED-

Do you want to eat your words, punk?

I can find you over a dozen instances of threads started by Katie in which my open and forthright questions were answered with nastiness and personal attacks from her. It is my right, on this board to attack her logic, posts and lies..it is also my right to respond to nastiness with nastiness. Shall we cut and paste some of your rather charming moments? PED you hypocritcal bastard.

I WILL POST AS I PLEASE.

There were all of a handful. But here is your challenge.

Find me the very first post to Katie that you made.

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 02:31 PM
Find me the very first post to Katie that you made.

LOL. I don't step and fetch for you, boy.

I know what Katie's my very first conversation with Katie was...and she certainly was no sweetheart.

PED
04-30-2004, 03:46 PM
Watch as your tasteless, classless, upbringing comes up before you fritz. They will appear over the course of the next couple of days or until this thread is locked or the moderators deal with you. If they do not, then it becomes open season on you in the same way.



http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=51008#51008

Islander- Fuck you. And fuck joe's entire family.


http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=90205#90205



Yes Michael, they do. ALL doctored politically motivated photos from anyside are bullshit and should not be tolerated (faked photos purporting to be the truth.)..save satirical photos that are used for amusement... You guys are so intent on arguing when I am not arguing with any of you in this thread. You guys truly do not know what to do when a conservative either agrees with you or has some of the same opinions as you...or understands your argument and tells you so. Your minds are so dead set on arguing that you can't make the switch.
I accepted Biedermand correction to my logic. I asked for clarification from PED and got it.

As far as Blue Collar Eddie goes...fuck him, fuck the bitch that bore him...fuck his grandmother in the old wrinkled ass..fuck his wife...son daughter etc. fuck them. Fuck him.
http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=90209#90209

No Woody- Fuck his family. Fuck them until they keel over and spit blood.

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 04:09 PM
Awwww what is the matter PED...are you having trouble winning this argument so you have to try and post all of my swearing rants....OK...I'll do the same.

we can match each other.

PED
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 2390

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:57 pm Post subject:

Well make up your damn mind baster boy, do you want us to be honest dicks like you or not?

Sheesh what a dumn cunt you are! Oxygen deprivation happened in-utero didn't it?

AND......



PED
Registered User
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 2391

Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2004 10:51 am Post subject:



It's about where he lived. Unless you somehow have access to the man's brain and can prove he does not remember so you can call him a liar.

You're a fucking wacked out nutsack!

Why would anyone give a fuck where he lived 16 years ago unless they're a fucking pussy shitting in his pants like you?

How fucking stupid can you be boy? This is an election coming up, issues are important to thinking people not where one resided 16 years ago. Oh I forgot, you're not a thinking individual, my bad, I forget you were just a fucking trogladite suffering from syphillis of the brain.

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 04:21 PM
and to show the innocnece of poor SLOW JOE and BLUE EDDIE...




Joe says...

BTW, FUCK YOU AND YOUR CHEAP WHORE, COCKSUCKING MOTHER. FUCK HER IN THE ASS ONCE FOR ME, FUCKING PUNK MORON.

Eddie says

Sorry gopher I though this was jays thread.

Sometimes I'm ALMOST as dumb
as fritz the cocksucker.

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 04:32 PM
Now, PED, exactly how dumb are you planning on looking this evening?

You have already been shown how foolish you look taking up for Katie...who can't even help herself from chasing after me and egging me on.

You have already been shown that your mouth and nasty thought are in-line with the ones that you chastise me for...making you either dumb or hypocritical for even thinking you could point it out without tasting your own medicine.

You have already been shown how the others that you have taken up for ALSO have very nasty mean spirited thoughts and posts...showing your lack or research and logical approach to coming after me.


I ask you...how much of a beating do really want this day?


Shall I pull out some wonderful quotes from dear Katie tonight? Ones that show exactly how far from being a lady she really is? Or should we continue to focus on your healthy discussions and meaningful dialogue that embody your typical posts?

Fritz the Cat
04-30-2004, 04:57 PM
Awwww I don't even have to make you look dumb...right on cue our pal Katie decides it would be prudent to post to and about me unprovoked in thread startd by Kentay in which I hadn't even acknowleged her.

my next door neighbor,managesa hedge fund and said things are more precarious than the corporate driven media is talking about...yea mensa mens fritzy is posting from his 90 ft Riva in Ft.Lauderdales Le Club
cleaning up the decks


Now does this look like a girl that is having a problem being trolled? I think not. this looks like a girl that can't help but continue to post to me over and pover and over and over again.

PED looks even more foolish. Damn this is fun.

PED
04-30-2004, 10:05 PM
Any beating you think you have given me is subjective fritz, and your subjectivity is way of the mark son.

Note, despite the first amendment's claim, there is no absolute freedom of speech, not in public, not in the classroom, not in the courts, not in the workplace, not in any environment, not in intimacy, and not in one where there are moderators.

You will lose. Your bravado and false sense of importance will be all you have to stroke your ego when I render it destroyed.

Fritz the Cat
05-01-2004, 09:24 AM
PED-

It is plain and simple. You can not get rid of me. It just won't happen. The Mods of this forum are wise enough to see that your "Fritz Witch Hunt" is yet another hypocritcal action on your part. They are objective enough to see the filth you post regulary. They are objective enough to see the filth the people you stick up for post regulary. They are objective enough to see the humor in you ranting and raving and crying and carrying on. They are objective enough to see you for who you are and I for who I am. And I love it.

P.S. for what it is worth, I did apologize to Katie for 2 of my comments...I feel they crossed a certain line.

But for what it is worth, I will not let up on her and I will not let up on you.

So, I see by your post...you sort of like getting pummeled about the forum by me. OK. Must be the masochist in you.

PED
05-01-2004, 10:15 AM
http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=94338#94338
Sat May 01, 2004 8:10 am

I'd say Katie has a few of those laying around the house....by the way she acts..she must have some serious mental health history in the family.

Her father thought he was a war hero and a Dr....instead he sat around all day and ate pudding and masturbated

PED
05-01-2004, 10:25 AM
http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=94320#94320
Sat May 01, 2004 7:52 am

…Post it, Katie. Post the apology I PM'd you for the 2 comments I made that were over the line. Post it. Please.

Show everyone on the forum how little class you have. Whine and moan and make a big deal out of my words, have people run around here like children yelling at me and asking for my hear.....

then when you get an apology....what do you do... threaten to use it in some attempt to try and embarrass me.

What a classless bitch you are. Dirty low down trashy bitch.


Guess what, Kate....I don't care who knows I apologized..I figured I would do it personally to you.

LOL. Guess I'll learn someday. I bet PED is really proud of the classless tramp he keeps sticking up for.

PED
05-01-2004, 10:33 AM
Post the apology publicly fritz so that all who saw you insult Katie will also see that you regret your actions.


http://www.ariannaonline.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=94367#94367
Posted: Sat May 01, 2004 8:26 am

Katie-

Seriuosly my apology for my 2 comments was sincere. My promise to follow your threads and make a fool out of you and you outlandish posts is also sincere.

Kay?

Fritz the Cat
05-01-2004, 10:34 AM
WEEEEEEEEEEE. we are having fun now.


PED-- this is pointless. I have a right to post to anybody I want to. I ahve a right, like anyone here, to be as vile as the next guy is...as long as it is accepted.

You accomplish nothing. Your Pal Katie is making you look like a royal ass becasue she KEEPS ENGAGING ME.

How do you explain that? You can't becasue you are a putz. Keep trying, PED, your bruises are starting to show.

Cheers.

PED
05-01-2004, 03:11 PM
PED-

the apology isn't for you or isn't your business...it is Katie's and if she found it insincere...Oh fucking well...so fucking what.... I did what I thought was right for the party it was intended...

you, sir, are just running around trying to exact revenge because I make you look foolish all the time, and it is failing.

I will continue to post in Katie's threads. I will continue to post what I think of her ideas, her posts, and her person.

There is not ONE DAMN THING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.

MMMWWWUUUUUHHHHHAAAAAAAAA HAHHHHHHAAAA HHAAAAAAA.

Fritz the Cat
05-02-2004, 12:47 PM
LOL.