Daily UV Index: United States

[foot_soldier]

http://sirocco.accuweather.com/adc_images2/english/forecast/uvi/640x480/US__TODuvi.gif

http://vortex.accuweather.com/phoenix2/images/common/keys/uv_400x40.gif

http://sirocco.accuweather.com/adc_images2/english/forecast/uvi/640x480/US__TODuvi.gif

[jayreynolds]

http://sirocco.accuweather.com/adc_images2/english/forecast/uvi/640x480/US__TODuvi.gif

http://vortex.accuweather.com/phoenix2/images/common/keys/uv_400x40.gif

http://sirocco.accuweather.com/adc_images2/english/forecast/uvi/640x480/US__TODuvi.gif
["Unlike some countries' indices, the US UV Index is not based upon surface observations. Rather, it is computed using forecasted ozone levels, a computer model that relates ozone levels to UV incidence on the ground, forecasted cloud amounts, and the elevation of the forecast cities."
"Currently, the computation of the UV Index does not include the effects of variable surface reflection (e.g., sand, water, or snow), atmospheric pollutants or haze."
http://www.ehso.com/ehshome/uvIndexCalc.htm

Interesting that the US government's network of actual UV measurements, which had begun registering a decrease in UV was shut down in 1988.
That seems a strange thing to do!
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/environment/o3-uv.html

[foot_soldier]

Facts disprove warnings about global warming
by William Robert Johnston
in The Brownsville Herald, April 4, 2001, p. A10
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/environment/warmingeditorial.html

Excerpt:

.....The primary advocates of global warming remain the environmentalists. They propose a drastic solution to a non-existent problem--a solution which is, amazingly, the same political policy they have unsuccessfully sought to impose for decades. Many of their leaders oppose free markets and seek to limit human development, and global warming is currently the best means to these ends. If people are hurt in the process, so be it.....

[jayreynolds]

The smaller increases of UV-B radiation at mid latitudes, while expected, have not yet been detected unambiguously. The record of mid-latitude UV-B measurements is not sufficient for the derivation of statistically significant trends. Little or no reliable historical information on the climatology of UV radiation is available from pre-ozone depletion days (e.g., pre-1980). The few available long-term UV measurement records have been hampered by the difficulty in maintaining stability of UV-measuring outdoor instruments over periods of decades, and by changes in atmospheric turbidity associated with local pollution. For example, measurements obtained with Robertson-Berger meters over 1974-85 suggested a decrease in UV radiation at 14 US locations (Scotto et al., 1988); however a recent re-analysis of these data has identified calibration shifts which, when removed, indicate that no significant trend can be derived from the data record (Weatherhead et al., 1997). Furthermore, increases in UV due to stratospheric ozone reductions may have been masked in some urban areas experiencing increasing levels of local air pollution (e.g. Garadzha and Nezval, 1987). Pronounced ozone losses have occurred for shorter periods of time, e.g. in the few years after the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo (Gleason et al., 1993) and over the Arctic during six of the past nine winters (Müller et al., 1997; Rex et al., 1997; Stolarski, 1997), with correspondingly higher measured UV-B radiation levels (e.g. Kerr and McElroy, 1993; Fioletov and Evans, 1997

Interesting that, absent any historical UV measurement data, 'footsoldier' turns into yet another "CHICKEN LITTLE", running around bawling about a UV index which is in actuality only a prediction based on a model, based on a proxy, based on a theory.

Of course, 'footsoldier' and her cohort 'Sore throat' were asked years ago to show actual historical UV measurements, but as the above text says, no such data exists.

They don't need no stinking data.
Look up and BELIEVE, the mantra of 'true believers'.

[foot_soldier]

I've posted a DAILY UV INDEX resource here for those who might be interested.

....."running around bawling....."

Hardly.

[Insurrectionchemistry]

Interesting---Reynolds is suddenly busier than a one legged paper hanger in a butt kicking contest.


Don't let him stick you with any crooked paper.


Contrary to Reynolds statements on Sun being good for kids----it is not when the UV is as high as now.


Also, be sure to apply this against Reynolds, Allsops, and the other clowns that can't seem to find why ozone rose 250,000 years back from the Siberian volcanic ranges activity. Volcanoes inject chlorine and fluorine into the upper atmosphere.


"""Pronounced ozone losses have occurred for shorter periods of time, e.g. in the few years after the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo (Gleason et al., 1993) and over the Arctic during six of the past nine winters (Müller et al., 1997; Rex et al., 1997; Stolarski, 1997), with correspondingly higher measured UV-B radiation levels (e.g. Kerr and McElroy, 1993; Fioletov and Evans, 1997"""


These chlorine injection effects killed the phytoplankton and raised the CO-2. No industry needed to raise it. Man today kills the phytoplankton too with UV and acids, and CO-2 rises.



Hint---look at the UV levels around the South Pole and over Australia. And the phytoplankton losses there.

[jayreynolds]

yeah, right, Jimbo. 'footsoldier' also believs that "These effects killed the phytoplankton and raised the CO-2. No industry needed to raise it.

[Insurrectionchemistry]

I see things are a little slow down at the old folks home today and the weeds are in the garden.

Yeah, industry doesn't determine atmospheric CO-2, but damage to the phytoplankton does. Be it 250,000 years ago from Siberican volcanoes injecting chlorine into the upper atmosphere or man's activities today getting Freon up there to raise the UV levels.

CO-2 is all about phytoplankton, and so is the oxygen level in the oceans.

CO-2 today is largely man's damage to the UV protection. Global Warming is the loss of the dimethyl sulfide low level cloud forming systems due to phytoplankton. Contrary to your intentionally false and misleading claims that Global Warming is some natural effect and not from man.

Things haven't changed in 250,000 years on that basic principle. 2/3 of the Earth's Surface is the home of phytoplankton, and its the largest carbon sink, the largest cloud seeding system, the largest source of oxygen, and the heart of the Sulfur Cycle. And its very sensitive to UV and acid.


And you have been misleading people far too long with false information.

[jayreynolds]

And you have been misleading people far too long with false information.

Well, let's turn the truth around to you first, Jimbo.
If any of your statements below are true, provide some proof of them:
I predict you will offer no proof, because they are all lies

The following quotes are from Jim Phelps:
"The HAARP Project is another one and one that I also gave the name for."

"My studies on the atmosphere effects shut down the cold war."

"I had succeeded in becoming one of the best of the nuclear scientists and discovered a weapon that was even worse than the H-bomb."

"I also solved the mystery behind the Tunguska Blast in 1908."

"My discovery that the G-protein effects of fluoride-metal complexes caused the AIDS epidemic set off a national emergency."

"I also walked on these volcanoes barefoot, just as Moses did in his time."

"It was via Jim Phelps' knowledge of these relevant issues on Global Climate change and old world warfare that the HAARP and chemtrail methods were conceived or invented."

"The invention of JP-8 jet fuel formula was also an inadvertent Icon for Jim Phelps..."

"I invented "nanoscience" and the revolution in small atom scale materials to effect global systems effects."

"Jim Phelps is the father of the nano- science revolution that started at ORNL in the mid-1980's."

"My nano-science discoveries are being used to control global warming and global health, and are the essences of global systems science. It uses the secrets of the Ark of the Covenant and the secrets of 5,000 year old Egyptian metals sciences."

"I have managed to end the production of Freon in the US due to these issues and one can see that Freon was banned by Congress just after my discoveries."

"I am the fail-safe for these problems, a kind of Egyptian Anubis watchdog for the feather balance of right vs wrong."

"Jim Phelps is the national lab person that discovered serious issues in terminal event theory of global systems, invented Star Wars weapons, forced the DOE to begin clean up of pollution damaging workers and communities, discovered the air pharmacology techniques [aka chemtrails], and forced the closure of K-25 and other DOE plants. My projects in the DOE and DOD are more classified than the H-bomb."

"Jim Phelps is the inventor of the HAARP project, the discover that the Earth's magnetic field is an MHD generator, the discover of the critical factors of fluoide's on health..."

"Jim Phelps invented systems that protect the health of animals and man on a scale that dwarfs what Moses attempted..."

"I invented the titanium technique, which essentially blocks the onset of fluorosis due to fluoride in the food and water chain."

"Today, my titanium air pharmacology invention keeps the cattle of the US from getting things like "Mad Cow" syndrome from the fallout of fluorides onto grass."

"I have the ranking most powerful weapon system design in Star Wars that literally taps the power from a Star."

"My studies also solved the basic issues on the cause of AIDS in 1985."

"I had succeeded in becoming one of the best of the nuclear scientists and discovered a weapon that was even worse than the H-bomb."

"I had become more a destroyer of worlds, as Oppenheimer quoted from the "Gita."

"In the DOE, Jim Phelps is considered one step removed from God.."

[DvdGStwrt]

Now Jay, how much of that was taken out of context and in context would read far differently?

I know your habit of bending the rules to suit your tastes. Care to put all of those back into the context of the articles/threads they were written in? I bet the flavor of the meanings change - a lot.

[Et in Arcadia ego]

Now Jay, how much of that was taken out of context and in context would read far differently?

Please direct yourself to the url in my sig and make that determination for yourself.

[foot_soldier]

http://sirocco.accuweather.com/adc_images2/english/forecast/uvi/640x480/US__TODuvi.gif

http://vortex.accuweather.com/phoenix2/images/common/keys/uv_400x40.gif

http://sirocco.accuweather.com/adc_images2/english/forecast/uvi/640x480/US__TODuvi.gif
.

[Insurrectionchemistry]

Since we're putting things into context, do be sure to read the current web pages:

http://www.doewatch.com/chemtrailslite.html

http://members.aol.com/doewatch/chemtrails.html

[Insurrectionchemistry]

BTW F_S,

A + on noting the CO-2 solution into oceans temp dependence.

Chemtrails aim increasing clouds for these regions.

Hint: What other GHG is sequestered in the ocean with higher GWP than CO-2?

[foot_soldier]

.....Hint: What other GHG is sequestered in the ocean with higher GWP than CO-2?.....
Answer: CH4

I've been at this for awhile now:

http://p211.ezboard.com/fchemtrailsstratosphericandtroposphericozoneresear ch

Thank you.

:wink: