PDA

View Full Version : Did anyone see the post


Gerry
01-05-2005, 07:02 PM
Before Lib pulled it off again.

So much for free speech, and SO much for pacifying nutjobs that harass .LOL

Woody
01-05-2005, 07:41 PM
I saw it. Not sure why she pulled. I guess you and I agree. Go figure!

Gerry
01-05-2005, 07:46 PM
I saw it. Not sure why she pulled. I guess you and I agree. Go figure!


Well, we can only guess

1. Lib is smitten by FBWC
2. She is afraid of him
4. She got tired of his relentless whining after enless PMs (I got 25 private e-mails on my AOL from Lib)
5. She's a member of the Stasi
6. She's the thought police
7. Lib thinks FBWC is a truthteller
8. Lib thinks Gerry is a liar
9. lib has the hots for Ingrid

mickey
01-05-2005, 07:48 PM
Before Lib pulled it off again.

So much for free speech, and SO much for pacifying nutjobs that harass .LOLWhat did the post say?

Gerry
01-05-2005, 08:04 PM
What did the post say?


From Ingrid (alias FBWC)
[redacted by Lib] I will say it again: You will never see another post from Marat attacking Ingrid.

And if I'm wrong, then that makes THREE; you, Fritz and Marat. I don't care who I annoy! I never did! Do I tell you not to post because you annoy virtually everybody? Have you ever wondered why so many of your threads die with no posts on them? "thoughts for the day" are some real barnburners, aren't they? I'm done conversing with you on this subject. Why are you such a mean-spirited, hateful person? Who gives a fuck what you think? Immature? You're about a hundred years older than me, and every bit as immature. Your bullshit that I "need to develop some sense of self" is so laughably pedestrian that it insults both of us for you to even say it! Who are you to psychoanalyze other posters?
This guy is a real sweetheart. but when he continued his abuse and I posted it he then became hysterical and told me to pull the quote. He slobbered that he was sorry he had said. that it was wrong, but at the time he did he though he was my friend. (Yeah ) He then went on a PM rage, first to me, endless PMS and when that did not result in anything but my posting those, he bombarded Lib with PMs and that resulted in my getting 25 e-mails in a row in my AOL mailbox all headlining that my mailbox is full and that "Ingrid" was attempting to PM me. That's when I was told by Lib to pull the above part. I refused so she pulled the whole thread. I then reposted it. And it was there for about 4 hours before she caught on. She then left the thread but redacted the offending part pertaining to Marat. She left in the offending part related to me. So I posted the redacted part. She pulled that. And now we are here. I have informed her that she is going to have to ban me from this forum but I will not let this obnoxious jerk get away with his personal attacks and abuse because I exposed him.

So when I disappear you will know why :-)

mickey
01-05-2005, 08:09 PM
Gerry, for what it's worth, I'm on your side. He may be liberal, but some liberals can also be assholes.

Gerry
01-05-2005, 08:10 PM
Gerry, for what it's worth, I'm on your side. He may be liberal, but some liberals can also be assholes.

Yep! It will be interesting to see how long this post survives LOL

Long live freedom of speech.

Ingrid
01-05-2005, 08:13 PM
Never have I contacted this poster. (Gerry.)

Ingrid
01-05-2005, 08:13 PM
Gerry, for what it's worth, I'm on your side. He may be liberal, but some liberals can also be assholes.
And now you have professed allegience to biggest hater of Jews on board.

mickey
01-05-2005, 08:15 PM
And now you have professed allegience to biggest hater of Jews on board.Ingrid, I love you. It's FBWC I always found egomaniacal.

Gerry
01-05-2005, 08:19 PM
Never have I contacted this poster. (Gerry.)


Sure FBWC I know. Tell you what. Go to the nearest Clinic and tell them you ran out of your Lithium.


they'll give you some.

BTW The whole exchange between you and me has been posted, page 2. Check it out including all your whining posts from this morning. It says "originally posted by Ingrid" deary. So, you cannot win this game. You are fucked either way. As Ingrid and as FBWC.

Take your meds. and sleep it off. Tomorrow is another day.

Gerry
01-05-2005, 08:31 PM
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums
1/5/2005 forums @ ariannao...Inbox full at Arianna Online Forums

Hello Gerry,

Ingrid has just tried to send you a private message. However, your private messages box on Arianna Online Forums has reached the specified quota. In order to receive further private messages, you must delete some messages. Please visit this page to do so:
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/private.php

Thanks,
Arianna Online Forums team


G - All posts contain the same message. They have been reported as spamming my e-mail

Woody
01-05-2005, 08:43 PM
I have tried to stay out of this problem because I know the BS that false acusations about multiple IDs can cause. And everyone knows the crap that went on between Who Care's and I. Everyone also know that Gerry and I rarely see eye to eye. Many of us have kept our mouths shut concerning Ingrid. Personally, I could care less who she is. There have been a few other hit and run posters who I am sure can be attributed to Who Care's. But many of us from day one figured at the very least Ingrid was fictional and a former poster, most likely Who Care's. Personally I don't give a damn who post under what names. But when the individual who complained the most, lied the most, levying false charges against many of us does the SAME THING, I am LMFAO! It removes any credibility this individual has had in the past.


As far as Gerry's point on this thread I find Lib's decision very odd. In particuliar considering much of the out of bounds posts the the accused, Who Care's, has made. Real personal info taken from other forums, not about posters, but their family members. Under the guise of "exposing" them. I am sure Lib has his reasons, but I wonder if those reason's are personal.

Gerry
01-05-2005, 08:55 PM
Well now, since Lib has been so busy pulling all my posts I wonder whether she/he has worn himself/herself out and is missing l'enfant terrible who is presently spamming. It seems to me his/her time is better spent paying some attention to the present looney that is flaming here.

Oh well. Any ideas who this angry person might be folks?????

mickey
01-05-2005, 09:04 PM
Well now, since Lib has been so busy pulling all my posts I wonder whether she/he has worn himself/herself out and is missing l'enfant terrible who is presently spamming. It seems to me his/her time is better spent paying some attention to the present looney that is flaming here.

Oh well. Any ideas who this angry person might be folks?????Yup, I've pointed it out several times.

PassingThru
01-05-2005, 09:16 PM
Gerry - why are you being so obnoxious to a moderator of this board? If you are tossed, it won't be about freedom of speech but total lack of netiquette. You are violating, repeatedly, forum rules.

Your obsession with this Ingrid issue is beyond reason or justification. You've accused any number of posters, wrongly, of impersonating others over this issue. And frankly, the filth you are posting is quite astounding ....

What gives?
.

Sweet Caroline
01-05-2005, 09:20 PM
PassingThru, perhaps Gerry has an understandable reason for going bonkers and posting all that filth. It could be PMS, an especially bad hair day, or even a splinter in her great toe from her wooden shoes.

I think any of those circumstances would cause even the preacher to cuss.

maria
01-05-2005, 09:36 PM
Gerry,

Seriously, is this you? This is not like anything I have ever read from you before. And now you are starting to spam the board so badly that you even insult yourself???? I don't get it. ????

cricket
01-05-2005, 09:41 PM
Maria, this too shall pass.....i think?

Sweet Caroline
01-05-2005, 09:42 PM
Someone is concerned that Gerry might get so upset that she will remove her finger from the dike. Then we will be in big trouble.
Stay calm, Gerry.

Citizen_X
01-05-2005, 09:47 PM
As far as Gerry's point on this thread I find Lib's decision very odd. In particuliar considering much of the out of bounds posts the the accused, Who Care's, has made. Real personal info taken from other forums, not about posters, but their family members. Under the guise of "exposing" them. I am sure Lib has his reasons, but I wonder if those reason's are personal.Woody that stuff must have been before my time, so I can't comment on any rationale of the above. But two wrongs-- don't make a right. Private Mail is private property. Period.

I know of no reputable or worthwhile message board that would tolerate an individual's posting of someone else's private mail. I'm certain both mods Lib and Mike are in agreement with each other on that, and if I'm not mistaken, Mike said as much today-- PM means just that. This appears to be (an excessively vindictive?) power struggle Gerry cannot ultimately expect to win.

maria
01-05-2005, 09:48 PM
Maria, this too shall pass.....i think?
if it is, in fact, Gerry. I seriously cannot imagine that this is her.

cricket
01-05-2005, 09:49 PM
http://rabbits.mediatafel.com/specialshapes/images/saletulip.jpg v http://www.fotosearch.com/comp/corel1/COR552/96000.jpg

PassingThru
01-05-2005, 09:55 PM
Maria, I know. Don't you find it incredulous that this could be Gerry!?

http://www.msjudith.net/valent/val900.jpg

PassingThru
01-05-2005, 10:14 PM
Cricket, is that surstromming in your picture, or just another red herring?


.

Islanders_for_the_cup_04
01-05-2005, 10:16 PM
Maybe Gerry hates "The Cardigans"?

http://imgs.idnes.cz/hudba/A031119_VLK_CARDIGANS_PLAKAT_V.JPG

cricket
01-05-2005, 10:18 PM
not sure but it is all a bit fishy if you ask....errrrrr....Gerry!


I am wonder if that was not Gerry.... is this?http://shilohpostcards.com/p10147.jpg

cricket
01-05-2005, 10:26 PM
Now what is it about that PET GOAT?????? I know...adopt a goat and you will never be wrong again!

PassingThru
01-05-2005, 10:28 PM
http://www.neilchase.com/images/Cardigans/cardigans.jpg


Islander, definitely must be Cardigans she doesn't like -- strictly straight lace for this poster who might be Gerry.

.

Islanders_for_the_cup_04
01-05-2005, 10:38 PM
A song for Gerry!!!

Lovefool

Dear, I fear wer're facing a problem
You love me no longer, I know
And maybe there is nothing
That I can do to make you do
Mama tells me I shouldn't bother
That I ought to stick to another man
A man that surely deserves me
But I think you do!

So I cry, I pray and I beg

Love me love me
Say that you love me
Fool me fool me
Go on and fool me
Love me love me
Pretend that you love me
Leave me leave me
Just say that you need me
Love me love me
Say that you love me
Leave me leave me
Just say that you need me
I can't care 'bout anything but you...

Lately I have desperately pondered,
Spent my nights awake and I wonder
What I could do have done in another way
To make you stay
Reason will not lead to solution
I will end up lost in confusion
I don't care if you really care
As long as you don't go

cricket
01-05-2005, 10:40 PM
http://thecostumeshop.50megs.com/G/787.jpg laces anyone?

Mr.88
01-05-2005, 10:53 PM
How dare you insinuate that there's bigger Jew-hater than me. I mean look at my name for God's sake. I've only been reading you douches for a couple days, but I've been on many a forum and I gotta say Ingrid just might be the dumbest motherfucker around. Where'd you learn English, from Huffington? And wasn't I supposed to be harrassed away by now. You guys deserve the Dems; and vice-versa

Islanders_for_the_cup_04
01-05-2005, 10:54 PM
How dare you insinuate that there's bigger Jew-hater than me. I mean look at my name for God's sake. I've only been reading you douches for a couple days, but I've been on many a forum and I gotta say Ingrid just might be the dumbest motherfucker around. Where'd you learn English, from Huffington? And wasn't I supposed to be harrassed away by now. You guys deserve the Dems; and vice-versaI thought you were an Eric Lindros fan.

My bad.

Islanders_for_the_cup_04
01-05-2005, 11:02 PM
If you see these people in your neighborhood...................................... ...Call the police!!!!



http://www.alwaysontherun.net/cardi4.jpg

Mr.88
01-05-2005, 11:12 PM
Lindros? LINDROS?? That faggot!!
I'd sooner watch soccer.
Actually 88 was Ing's SAT score

Mr.88
01-05-2005, 11:15 PM
I spoke in anger.
Lindros is cool

gaiacomm
01-06-2005, 09:02 AM
Jews will be Jews!

Gerry
01-07-2005, 02:18 PM
Everyone with an ounce of sense knows that NON of the PMs are safe, NOR are they private. It is for that reason that some of you have my personal e-mail and we exchange thoughts that way. THEY are private!

When a PM facility is used to harass someone, or to attack, or lie , eventhough the author himself admits to the deceit and clearly states he has ALL intention to continue, there is nothing private about the exchange, NOTHING. There is such a thing as saying things in confidence, and I have MANY PMs and private e-mails from posters I would never divulge. But a deliberate sabotage of this forum, and using other posters on this board to attack in order to create a ruse is dispicable. There is NO such thing as doctor/patient privilege or lawyer/client privilege on this forum covering such activities.
Here we come to discuss issues. We present our views, They are, or should be, based on truth, our truth as best we know it. It is irrelevant what name (nom de plume) is used. The views should reflect the views of the author. After a while we get to know the various people. By their writing style, their opinions, their likes and dislikes. When a wellknown poster with a history of personal attacks suddenly morphs into the Holy Virgin in the diguise of a puny looking bleached blonde (definitely NOT Swedish) who professes to be Swedish and speaks like Bullwinkels Natasha and Boris, it is a bore, it is simplistic and his holier than thou rhetoric is neither refreshing nor real. It is a play, a phony play, and some simpletons on this forum consider it cute and endearing. They also find Bush endearing. While others "flirt" with this aberation.

The Moderators on this forum KNOW full well that this "ingrid" aberation is FBWC. They rather ban bonafide posters from this forum and remove posts than call FBWC to task,

The offending line that FBWC wrote about Marat was known to Marat. Evidently he did not object because he knew it to be false. The reason that FBWC became SO hysterical was not because he had made a mistake and I was wrong in posting it for all to see, but because he lied. I only remembered part of the story What I did not quite remember was the following:

Two_iron was doing his usual blustering and threatened FBWC. This went on for quite some time, Marat read all this nonsense and tried to defend FBWC. This led to two_iron inviting Marat to come to Texas so he coukld ":take care of him", which in turn resulted in the facetious acceptance by Marat to come to Texas and inviting FBWC to come along. Silly kid stuff. No one ever considered doing anything of the sort, and the next day no one even remembered it. But those who are involved in subterfuge or sabotage do not like disclosure, so he chose Marat as a victim with which to attack me, making him the good guy conscerned about Marat and me the Villain ready to throw poor Marat to the wolves by posting that particular line. It was a joke. But somehow Lib fell for it. Lib should NOT be a moderator.

Lib was wrong in pulling what she did. Mike is wrong in not addressing the FBWC issue and moving the posts. Lib stated that FBWC told her things.........implying that I, Gerry, was lying.
And than the various FBWC minions chime in about the "filth" that Gerry spouts on this forum.
I suggest that everyone who believes that get out their respective dictionaries and read up on the definition of FILTH.

FBWC is part of the Moderator group, or else he would never have gotten away with what he did, and none of the idiotic actions by these moderators would have taken place. I have 25 personal e-mails in my AOL account. 25!!!

PErsonally I couldn't care less about this forum. I have better things to do. I have homes to show, houses to sell. So I don't need Bullwinkel crap coming to me via fictinional puny bleached blondes. (I would have thought he could at LEAST have chosen a somewhat better looking broad) . I certainly don't need sanctimoneous moderators who ask for cooperation from the bonfide posters and request nothing from the fakers, screamer, ranters. When those who scream are guilty of not only having divulged personal information about other posters but also about their family members, they evidently can't take as well as they dole out. We have different rule for different people. And moderators who should not be moderators.

Gerry
01-07-2005, 06:46 PM
You've accused any number of posters, wrongly, of impersonating others over this issue. And frankly, the filth you are posting is quite astounding ....Passing Thru

What rock did your crawl out from.???

Who did I accuse of being "Ingrid" other than FBWC. I hadn't been on the forum for weeks and when I returned there "she" was. Please back up your allegation and gives us some proof of that. I'm sure you can cut and paste.

And what is the filth I posted.? Please provide same. Thank you.

Mike
01-07-2005, 07:03 PM
My, you are a thoroughly happy person, aren't you?

Everyone with an ounce of sense knows that NON of the PMs are safe, NOR are they private. It is for that reason that some of you have my personal e-mail and we exchange thoughts that way. THEY are private! Arianna Online uses software that has every bit as much legitimacy and built-in safeguards as you're likely to find with ANY ISP...including AOL. PM's are saved in folders just as they are on AOL, PRODIGY, VERIZON...ETC.

They are as secure as the people who operate the system allow them to be. The executives in question include the two partners providing internet services for many firms, including Arianna. Their authority isn't given to moderators.

Neither we nor any other subscribers to Arianna has access to the folders containing PM's. except their own. In that regard it's exactly the same as your account on AOL.

I really don't know why I'm saying this to you...
You don't WANT to believe it, so you're not going to...it's as simple as that.

Gerry
01-08-2005, 11:09 AM
My, you are a thoroughly happy person, aren't you?

Arianna Online uses software that has every bit as much legitimacy and built-in safeguards as you're likely to find with ANY ISP...including AOL. PM's are saved in folders just as they are on AOL, PRODIGY, VERIZON...ETC.

They are as secure as the people who operate the system allow them to be. The executives in question include the two partners providing internet services for many firms, including Arianna. Their authority isn't given to moderators.

Neither we nor any other subscribers to Arianna has access to the folders containing PM's. except their own. In that regard it's exactly the same as your account on AOL.

I really don't know why I'm saying this to you...
You don't WANT to believe it, so you're not going to...it's as simple as that.

It is NOT an issue of software. The ISSUE really IS that one never knows whith WHOM one is dealing. So, supposed private PMs are passed on to other posters without the author's knowledge. Alliances on this forum, whether through family ties or cultivation, are also not new to this board. That makes the avenue of PM-ing not the best /safest way to communicate. Those who have my e-mail I trust implicitly, and they, so far, have not abused that trust, as FAR AS I KNOW!!.

Why bother to write Mike if your foregone conclusion is that I won't buy it? Could it be that you YOURSELF don't buy it?

It is a matter of trust and PMs have become an easy tool with which to manipulate people and gather ones minions to do ones bidding. Wittness Sweet Caroline and Austin suddenly popping up to FBWC's defense. You might call it a coincidence, I am not that naive.

Mike
01-08-2005, 12:06 PM
It is NOT an issue of software. The ISSUE really IS that one never knows whith WHOM one is dealing. So, supposed private PMs are passed on to other posters without the author's knowledge. Alliances on this forum, whether through family ties or cultivation, are also not new to this board. That makes the avenue of PM-ing not the best /safest way to communicate. Those who have my e-mail I trust implicitly, and they, so far, have not abused that trust, as FAR AS I KNOW!!.

Why bother to write Mike if your foregone conclusion is that I won't buy it? Could it be that you YOURSELF don't buy it?

It is a matter of trust and PMs have become an easy tool with which to manipulate people and gather ones minions to do ones bidding. Wittness Sweet Caroline and Austin suddenly popping up to FBWC's defense. You might call it a coincidence, I am not that naive.Everything you've said about "alliances" and whatnot could as easily be applied to ordinary email as well
Your clear implication over several posts was that PM's are NOT SECURE on this board. In fact you implied that moderators could read them. That's untrue. I'm pretty sure they're as secure here as they would be on Yahoo, prodigy, aol...

I'd send this to you via email, but you'd have a coronary over it....

Gerry
01-08-2005, 12:59 PM
Everything you've said about "alliances" and whatnot could as easily be applied to ordinary email as well
Your clear implication over several posts was that PM's are NOT SECURE on this board. In fact you implied that moderators could read them. That's untrue. I'm pretty sure they're as secure here as they would be on Yahoo, prodigy, aol...

I'd send this to you via email, but you'd have a coronary over it....


No it doesn't, because I don't hand out my e-mail. Those who have it have earned my trust.

PM's are available to anyone. And as I personally witnessed a few days ago can also become a source of harassment. PMs are therefore not secure and never have been. It is an open avenue of communication. The internet is not. I did not invite FBWC's PMs to me. He used them to harass me. He cannot do this via e-mail b ecause he does not have my e-mail address. That is the difference between PM-ing and e-mailing. Nowhere did I imply that moderators can read them, but since you bring it up, are you sure you cannot?

It amazes me that I have to point this out.

Sweet Caroline
01-08-2005, 03:58 PM
Gerry, is there anything too trivial for you to spend hours and hours yapping about? Is there the slightest chance that you will drop this topic and continue with your usual diatribe, which mercifully did not contain my name?

Does it say anything to you that a few of the people whose names you have decided to include in your recent posts about yourself seem not to understand the point you are making about them? Include me in the group of bewildered.

gaiacomm
01-08-2005, 05:16 PM
Yes, come on Gerry!

Gerry
01-08-2005, 05:59 PM
Gerry, is there anything too trivial for you to spend hours and hours yapping about? Is there the slightest chance that you will drop this topic and continue with your usual diatribe, which mercifully did not contain my name?

Does it say anything to you that a few of the people whose names you have decided to include in your recent posts about yourself seem not to understand the point you are making about them? Include me in the group of bewildered.

My humble apologies for not requesting your holyness permission to answer a post directed at me. Next time I shall ask persmission in triplicate. Make sure you sign it.

You are irrelevant in this whole equasion except when you involve yourself. See that's part of the choices we make. It's the darndest thing, sometime it will just smack you right in the face.
You don't like the attention you get, then don't become involved. :-)

Sweet Caroline
01-08-2005, 06:21 PM
You don't like the attention you get, then don't become involved.

Some of us were posting in a thread that had NOTHING to do with you. You brought us into it and accused us of not being ourselves. That got my dander up a bit.

As for your responding, I remind you that you started this stupid junk about Ingrid. Lord knows why. And you went off on a tangent, accusing several of us of something or other. Lord knows what.

I should be able to "get involved" in posting here without having some nut accuse me of not being myself.

PassingThru
01-08-2005, 06:30 PM
Originally posted by Gerry
You've accused any number of posters, wrongly, of impersonating others over this issue. And frankly, the filth you are posting is quite astounding ....Passing Thru What rock did your crawl out from.???

Who did I accuse of being "Ingrid" other than FBWC. I hadn't been on the forum for weeks and when I returned there "she" was. Please back up your allegation and gives us some proof of that. I'm sure you can cut and paste.

And what is the filth I posted.? Please provide same. Thank you.
You deceitful, sanctimonious old hag you. I didn't specify "Ingrid". You threw accusations out about several posts not being authored by those posters who authored them during your feckless little witch hunt. Now you want to play wide-eyed and innocent? Piss off.

BTW, I issued forth from my mother, a rock of stability, sanity, self-awareness, open-mindedness, intelligence, wit, humor and grace -- totally the opposite of you.

Originally posted by Gerry
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=212823&highlight=Austin#post212823 (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=212823&highlight=Austin#post212823)

As a matter of information:

Observe the post headed "FBWC Autographs" authored by Austin, and answered by Sweet Caroline. .

When checking the members list it becomes obvious, rather quickly, that Austin has NOT visited this forum for a very long time. Austin is a very nice lady who is posting at Hypercritics.

Everyone who is registered and visits this site is recorded there. Austin was not here and did not post that thread. So WHO DID?

Cute ain't it.?
Originally posted by Gerry
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=212902&highlight=Austin#post212902 (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=212902&highlight=Austin#post212902)
Originally Posted by Austin
I indeed did post the FBWC Autograph Book. Perhaps I should have added "Seniors 2005 Rock!!!" on the bottom to make it more apparent how much of a high school atmosphere this place has become. (It was a joke)

I really am surprised, though, that more people didn't want to add their notes in the send-off autograph book. That's OK. I guess he's gotten enough attention on this thread about "Ingrid" so as to deem my little thread paltry and unworthy of the incessant chatter over identities.

Peace and Fun,
Austin
I have known Austin for quite some time, and the question begs why, if she really did post the thread her name has her as absent from this board. Check all the regulars that post here and it is quickly obvious that every last posting/visit is recorded. Austin's remains missing.

IF Austin DID indeed post this thread while not having been here for MANY months, the questions arises WHAT precisely prompted her to do so, at this opportune moment , since she posts at Hypercritics.
Was Austin recruited? And if so by WHOM?

See, the whole thing stinks like 3 day old fish. Or perhaps Austin has let herself be used. Never a smart thing to do sweetie.

PS Why should anyone want to sign an autograph book for FBWC or anyone else for that matter? Is he in need of handholding or simple attention.
Originally posted by Gerry http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=212914&highlight=Austin#post212914 (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=212914&highlight=Austin#post212914)
Originally Posted by Sweet Caroline
I know who posted it. But I will leave it to the poster to tell IF the poster wants to. ;)

This thread is fun.

By the way, I find many posts by Austin here. What gives you the idea that Austin was not here? Do you have some information that we lesser members do not have?

Another liar. Austin has not been here for MONTHS and neither have YOU!!
I too know who posted it and it was NOT Austin. I am SO glad you enjoy 2-year olds silly games.
I have given FBWC ample time to come clean and he still hides. You showed up a week ago. We've had to put up with the idiotic mumblings? Since you find it ever so shamefull to forward PMs how about if I post them for this whole forum to see, just what a egotistical blowhard this FBWC really is? Anything to get attention. Ah, what a fun thread this is. It's not about this thread hon. It's about credibility and being somewhat honest which seems to be difficult for you and your hero.

So get a life already or understand what the fuck you are talking about.
Originally posted by Gerry
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=212945&highlight=Austin#post212945 (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=212945&highlight=Austin#post212945)
There are still people on this forum that believe in the Ingrid farce. Tell me, when does deceit stop being funny and when does it become wrong? With your namastah I suggest you entertain those thoughts.

Unless the server has given Austin a dispensation by allowing her to post while she is officially NOT HERE, I do not believe this post was by Austin but by an imposter. How's that for conspiracy huh?

Your definition of what is fun needs some drastice revision. Originally posted by Sweet Caroline
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=212978&postcount=162 (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=212978&postcount=162)
I have been posting. Sorry if you didn't notice my posts. I think the problem is that between you verbose postings and you obsession with Ingrid, you spend your time gazing in the mirror and don't notice what else is going on here.

But it is I. Caroline, sweet as ever.

If you won't believe me and Austin and PassingThru, you are a hopeless case since we have been around for quite a while.

Liberal, please do not post my IP, even in a PM to this dunderhead. And please do not confirm or deny that I am the real Sweet Caroline.
Originally posted by Gerry
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=213176&postcount=177 (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=213176&postcount=177)
Dear Lib,

this one's another drama, created this time by Sweet Caroline who in defense of FBWC is inferring (not quite saying but inferring and showing considerable "stress") that she posted the Austin post. She is living her own drama. That is all it is.

Not to worry. She does not for ONE second believe that you would ever release either her IP or mine or FBWCs for that matter. It's another ruse. It sounds convincing to HER
The lady has evidently nothing better to do.
Originally posted by Austin
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=213177&postcount=178 (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=213177&postcount=178)
Lib,

Please end this nonsense right now and just admit that I have a different IP address than Sweet Caroline. I don't think that's divulging too much.

Respectfully,
Austin
Originally posted by Sweet Caroline
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=213178&postcount=179 (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=213178&postcount=179)
I am fine with that. But Lib risks having Gerry think he is an imposter.

PassingThru
01-08-2005, 06:33 PM
Posts by the susposedly non-existent or absent posters in the last three months:
Search: (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/search.php?query=&searchuser=PassingThru&exactname=1&starteronly=0&forumchoice[]=0&childforums=1&titleonly=0&showposts=1&searchdate=90&beforeafter=after&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending&replyless=0&replylimit=0&searchthread=0&searchthreadid=0&saveprefs=1&): (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/search.php?query=&searchuser=Austin&exactname=1&starteronly=0&forumchoice[]=0&childforums=1&titleonly=0&showposts=1&searchdate=90&beforeafter=after&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending&replyless=0&replylimit=0&searchthread=0&searchthreadid=0&saveprefs=1&) Posts Made By: Austin (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/member.php?u=156)
Showing results 126 to 133 of 133 / Search took 0.14 seconds.
Search: (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/search.php?query=&searchuser=PassingThru&exactname=1&starteronly=0&forumchoice[]=0&childforums=1&titleonly=0&showposts=1&searchdate=90&beforeafter=after&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending&replyless=0&replylimit=0&searchthread=0&searchthreadid=0&saveprefs=1&) Posts Made By: PassingThru (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/member.php?u=270)
Showing results 1 to 25 of 500 / Search took 0.88 seconds.
Search: (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/search.php?query=&searchuser=Sweet+Caroline&exactname=1&starteronly=0&forumchoice[]=0&childforums=1&titleonly=0&showposts=1&searchdate=90&beforeafter=after&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending&replyless=0&replylimit=0&searchthread=0&searchthreadid=0&saveprefs=1&) Posts Made By: Sweet Caroline (http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/member.php?u=43)
Showing results 1 to 25 of 74 / Search took 0.15 seconds.

Figure out how the internet works Gerry before you go nuts all over it.

.

PassingThru
01-08-2005, 06:54 PM
Originally Posted by Gerry

It is NOT an issue of software. The ISSUE really IS that one never knows whith WHOM one is dealing. So, supposed private PMs are passed on to other posters without the author's knowledge.

This is rich from the poster who admitted on threads to having passed supposedly private PMs she received on to other posters without the author's knowledge.

Alliances on this forum, whether through family ties or cultivation, are also not new to this board. That makes the avenue of PM-ing not the best /safest way to communicate. Those who have my e-mail I trust implicitly, and they, so far, have not abused that trust, as FAR AS I KNOW!!.

Why bother to write Mike if your foregone conclusion is that I won't buy it? Could it be that you YOURSELF don't buy it?

Mike, nor no other moderator, can control what you choose to do with PMs you receive on this forum - with the exception of deleting those you mistakenly choose to post in threads. If Mike mistook your intent in how you expressed that you cannot be trusted to keep PMs confidential, then so did many others here. Many of us thought you were implying the moderators had privileges to read posters' PMs without the poster's knowledge through software rights -- a patent impossibility but one you keep insinuating.

It is a matter of trust and PMs have become an easy tool with which to manipulate people and gather ones minions to do ones bidding. Wittness Sweet Caroline and Austin suddenly popping up to FBWC's defense. You might call it a coincidence, I am not that naive.

Another unsubstantiated allegation for which you have no proof and which solely originates from your own bias and delusions. You are wrong in this supposition. I know that for a fact and no, you don't deserve any explanations you fatuous old biddy.


.

Gerry
01-08-2005, 09:35 PM
This is rich from the poster who admitted on threads to having passed supposedly private PMs she received on to other posters without the author's knowledge.

I posted FBWC's harrassing PMs on the forum, after he continued to harass me and attack in openly as "ingrid" saying I was the greatest Jew hater in the whole world. He then very sanctimoneously posted that he had NEVER PM-ed this woman Gerry(Like Clinton)


Mike, nor no other moderator, can control what you choose to do with PMs you receive on this forum - with the exception of deleting those you mistakenly choose to post in threads. If Mike mistook your intent in how you expressed that you cannot be trusted to keep PMs confidential, then so did many others here. Many of us thought you were implying the moderators had privileges to read posters' PMs without the poster's knowledge through software rights -- a patent impossibility but one you keep insinuating.

Hey, nitwit, listen good..........the PM feature is meant for Private Messaging. It is NOT meant for harassment or abuse. Since the abuse by FBWC continued via MY PM as well as via "Ingrid " on the open forum. I decided to put a stop to it after long and hard thinking. I will do the same again today. My mailbox is full and I intend to keep it that way, just to prevent assholes like FBWC and YOU from abusing it . Got that. !! After I posted them FBWC went nuts and started PM-ing me and screamed for me to take the PM dealing with Marat off. I did NOT. So he went whining to LIB (Not Mike) and she in turn PM-ed me 25 times on my AOL account (spamming) She then redacted the part about Marat. I replaced it. She pulled the whole thread. Don't go interpreting what Mike though. He can speak for himself. I have NEVER implied that moderators read posters PM EVER!!! (Since your are so good at cutting and pasting pls provide THAT post)You know nothing. Obviously you haven't read the PMs and have no clue, but you know how to cut and past and have an opinion. Get lost, will you??

Another unsubstantiated allegation for which you have no proof and which solely originates from your own bias and delusions. You are wrong in this supposition. I know that for a fact and no, you don't deserve any explanations you fatuous old biddy.

O Yeah??? Since you just blasted me about posting the PMs, you now tell me I make allegations? Did you read them.? If not than why make the allegation above?? If you DID read them then you know they are the fact. They are still there. Want me to post them again. Haven't had enough of this asshole? What is it that you want Huh??? Why don't you provides some fact that the PMs I posted are NOT from "Ingrid" alias FBWC. He admits it. So who is the asshole here huh? Want to start again? You're not smart enoug. Go get blue fingers and cut and paste some more.
Get a life already


Good grief!!!

maria
01-08-2005, 10:07 PM
My mailbox is full and I intend to keep it that way, just to prevent assholes like FBWC and YOU from abusing it . Got that. !!

Oh, good god, gerry, just uncheck the box to be PMed, you can also uncheck the box to be emailed. this is getting absurd. :roll:

PassingThru
01-08-2005, 10:54 PM
Originally Posted by Gerry
This is rich from the poster who admitted on threads to having passed supposedly private PMs she received on to other posters without the author's knowledge.
I posted FBWC's harrassing PMs on the forum, after he continued to harass me and attack in openly as "ingrid" saying I was the greatest Jew hater in the whole world. He then very sanctimoneously posted that he had NEVER PM-ed this woman Gerry(Like Clinton)

You also posted your intent to forward Ingrid's PMs to another poster without asking her permission to do so. You did this before ever you posted PMs to threads in the forum. You have proven you are not trustworthy. I intuited this about you long ago. That is why I have never attempted private contact with you.

Hey, nitwit, listen good..........the PM feature is meant for Private Messaging. It is NOT meant for harassment or abuse.

You have choices about Private Messaging which you control. You can choose whether or not to participate in private messaging at all. You can choose whether or not to have notices about PMs sent to your email. You can choose to put posters on ignore and they'll be unable to Private Message you. You had every control over whether or not Ingrid or anyone else accessed you.

Since the abuse by FBWC continued via MY PM as well as via "Ingrid " on the open forum. I decided to put a stop to it after long and hard thinking. I will do the same again today. My mailbox is full and I intend to keep it that way, just to prevent assholes like FBWC and YOU from abusing it .

I have no intention of contacting you in any personal way -- I won't break with my good judgment not to thus far. Anything I have to say to you can be said publicly. You however prevent others from reaching you by your ignorance about how the web works.

Got that. !! After I posted them FBWC went nuts and started PM-ing me and screamed for me to take the PM dealing with Marat off. I did NOT. So he went whining to LIB (Not Mike) and she in turn PM-ed me 25 times on my AOL account (spamming) She then redacted the part about Marat. I replaced it. She pulled the whole thread. Don't go interpreting what Mike though. He can speak for himself.

Mike did speak for himself. He said he concluded from your posts what I said I and others have concluded from your posts -- that is a failure on your part to communicate pelucidly.

I have NEVER implied that moderators read posters PM EVER!!! (Since your are so good at cutting and pasting pls provide THAT post)You know nothing. Obviously you haven't read the PMs and have no clue, but you know how to cut and past and have an opinion. Get lost, will you??

Beg all you want Gerry. I will do what I want. I don't choose to "get lost". I read the PMs which you posted to an open forum, proving yet again you are not trustworthy with people's confidences.

GERIATRIC: It is a matter of trust and PMs have become an easy tool with which to manipulate people and gather ones minions to do ones bidding. Wittness Sweet Caroline and Austin suddenly popping up to FBWC's defense. You might call it a coincidence, I am not that naive.


PrettyYoungThing: Another unsubstantiated allegation for which you have no proof and which solely originates from your own bias and delusions. You are wrong in this supposition. I know that for a fact and no, you don't deserve any explanations you fatuous old biddy.


O Yeah??? Since you just blasted me about posting the PMs, you now tell me I make allegations? Did you read them.? If not than why make the allegation above??

You alleged that FBWC and/or Ingrid PM'd Sweet Caroline and Austin to come to his defense. He did not. You were again clueless about how this forum works; about who was active here; but assumed you had omniscient knowledge. You slurred 4 people in that manufactured scenario, but what do you care?

If you DID read them then you know they are the fact. They are still there. Want me to post them again. Haven't had enough of this asshole? What is it that you want Huh??? Why don't you provides some fact that the PMs I posted are NOT from "Ingrid" alias FBWC. He admits it. So who is the asshole here huh?

Guess you are yet again. You think this is all about Gerry. Sweet Caroline has pinned it perfectly - You are most egocentric as well as a control freak.


Want to start again? You're not smart enoug. Go get blue fingers and cut and paste some more.
Get a life already

Good grief!!!
Gerry, continue in this vein please. I highly approve how you demonstrate explicitly for the board your level of spite and idiocy.

.

Sweet Caroline
01-08-2005, 11:52 PM
4. It is fine to attack another poster's point of view but posts whose purpose is to personally attack another poster or their family are not permitted.


Another rule that Gerry has broken. She started an entire thread to attack Ingrid. She has also attacked me and Austin, accusing us of not being ourselves.
There is no choice but to suspend her.

gaiacomm
01-09-2005, 07:18 AM
Interesting!

Sweet Caroline
01-09-2005, 09:44 PM
Someone closed a topic I was posting in. That really upsets me. I'll just have my say here.



Remember, there was a time here when we actually had people having conservations with themselves by posting under one name and answering under another. That was just too much.



I do not remember that, but I don't read much of the stuff here, especially all that cussing. Not even FBWC's cussing.

Were the posters who engaged in that behavior causing a problem? In other words, so what?

Now I have another nit-picking question. We have discussed several posters from the same computer. What about several different people all using the same user name. For example, am I permitted to let anyone I chose log in as Sweet Caroline and post?

The trouble with rules is that you have to keep refining them until they are so bulky that they begin to resemble the Texas State Constitution.